Publication:
Comparison of diode laser - Oral tissue interaction to different wavelengths. In vitro study of porcine periodontal pockets and oral mucosa.

dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Corrales, A
dc.contributor.authorRizcala-Orlando, Y
dc.contributor.authorMontero-Miralles, P
dc.contributor.authorVolland, G
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Pérez, J-L
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Lagares, D
dc.contributor.authorSerrera-Figallo, M-A
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T14:39:46Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T14:39:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-01
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of diode lasers at different wavelengths and power settings in handmade incisions in periodontal pockets and in oral mucosa of porcine tissue considering thermal damage, necrosis and the affected area of the soft tissue. Combining the following laser wavelengths, 445nm, 532nm (KTP), 810nm, 980nm, 1064nm and 1470nm, and a power range from 0.5W to 2.0W in a continuous wave mode (CW), we made handmade incisions in porcine periodontal pockets and oral mucosa. After histological processing, we measured the area of ​​lost tissue, the area of ​​thermal damage and the area of ​​necrosis. Then, we performed ANOVA to evaluate the difference between groups and two-way ANOVA to identify the influence of the laser-type variables and the power on the results. We applied an ANOVA test to evaluate the results, where statistical analysis showed clear differences between the 1470nm and 810nm laser groups that refer to thermal damage and necrosis in the periodontal pocket surface. Regarding the oral mucosa surface, the 1064nm laser showed differences in the analysis of lost tissue. According to the applied power, all the variables we studied (lost tissue area, area of thermal damage and necrosis) showed higher values when using a power of 2.0W instead of 0.5W. According to our results, the 810nm diode laser for oral soft-tissue biopsy using power ranges between 0.5W and 2W would be the best choice to avoid thermal damage in peri-incisional margins.
dc.identifier.doi10.4317/medoral.23317
dc.identifier.essn1698-6946
dc.identifier.pmcPMC7103451
dc.identifier.pmid31967980
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103451/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23317
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/14984
dc.issue.number2
dc.journal.titleMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal
dc.journal.titleabbreviationMed Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationIBIS
dc.page.numbere224-e232
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.meshAnimals
dc.subject.meshLaser Therapy
dc.subject.meshLasers, Semiconductor
dc.subject.meshMouth Mucosa
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Pocket
dc.subject.meshResearch Design
dc.subject.meshSwine
dc.titleComparison of diode laser - Oral tissue interaction to different wavelengths. In vitro study of porcine periodontal pockets and oral mucosa.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number25
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC7103451.pdf
Size:
741.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format