Publication:
Effectiveness and Safety in Remote Monitoring of Patients with Pacemakers Five Years after an Implant: The Poniente Study.

dc.contributor.authorLópez-Liria, Remedios
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Villegas, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorLeal-Costa, César
dc.contributor.authorPeiró, Salvador
dc.contributor.authorRobles-Musso, Emilio
dc.contributor.authorBautista-Mesa, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorRocamora-Pérez, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorLappegård, Knut Tore
dc.contributor.authorCatalán-Matamoros, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T14:42:06Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T14:42:06Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-23
dc.description.abstractHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional capacity values immediately after pacemaker (PM) implantation have been well established; however, not much has been known about its long-term effects. The present study compared the long-term effectiveness and safety of remote monitoring plus a clinic visit versus clinic visits alone during follow-up of adults implanted with PMs. This study was a single-centre, controlled, non-randomised, non-blinded clinical trial. Data were collected pre-implantation and after 60 months. The patients in the PONIENTE study were assigned to two different groups: remote monitoring (RM) and conventional monitoring (CM). The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire was used to assess HRQoL and Duke Activity Status Index was used for the functional capacity. After five years, 55 patients completed the study (RM = 21; CM = 34). EuroQol-5D and functional capacity values were improved; however, significant differences were observed only in the EQ5D visual analogue scale (p
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph17041431
dc.identifier.essn1660-4601
dc.identifier.pmcPMC7068341
dc.identifier.pmid32102208
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068341/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1431/pdf?version=1646647493
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/15165
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleInternational journal of environmental research and public health
dc.journal.titleabbreviationInt J Environ Res Public Health
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationAPES Hospital de Poniente de Almería
dc.pubmedtypeComparative Study
dc.pubmedtypeEvaluation Study
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjecthealth-related quality of life
dc.subjectlong-term follow-up
dc.subjectpacemaker
dc.subjectremote monitoring
dc.subjecttelemedicine
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over
dc.subject.meshAmbulatory Care
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshMonitoring, Physiologic
dc.subject.meshPacemaker, Artificial
dc.subject.meshPatient Safety
dc.subject.meshQuality of Life
dc.subject.meshSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.meshTelemedicine
dc.subject.meshVisual Analog Scale
dc.titleEffectiveness and Safety in Remote Monitoring of Patients with Pacemakers Five Years after an Implant: The Poniente Study.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number17
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC7068341.pdf
Size:
563.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format