Publication:
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2022-04-22

Authors

Lunardi, Mattia
Louvard, Yves
Lefevre, Thierry
Stankovic, Goran
Burzotta, Francesco
Kassab, Ghassan S
Lassen, Jens Flensted
Darremont, Olivier
Garg, Scot
Koo, Bon-Kwon

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Europa Digital & Publishing
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The Bifurcation Academic Research Consortium (Bif-ARC) project originated from the need to overcome the paucity of standardization and comparability between studies involving bifurcation coronary lesions. This document is the result of a collaborative effort between academic research organizations and the most renowned interventional cardiology societies focused on bifurcation lesions in Europe, the United States, and Asia. This consensus provides standardized definitions for bifurcation lesions; the criteria to judge the side branch relevance; the procedural, mechanistic, and clinical endpoints for every type of bifurcation study; and the follow-up methods. Considering the complexity of bifurcation lesions and their evaluation, detailed instructions and technical aspects for site and core laboratory analysis of bifurcation lesions are also reported. The recommendations included within this consensus will facilitate pooled analyses and the effective comparison of data in the future, improving the clinical relevance of trials in bifurcation lesions, and the quality of care in this subset of patients.

Description

MeSH Terms

United States
Follow-Up Studies
Clinical Relevance
Heart
Cardiology

DeCS Terms

Cardiología
Corazón
Estados Unidos
Estudios de seguimiento
Relevancia clínica

CIE Terms

Keywords

Academic, Research, Consortium, Bifurcation, Clinical trials, Endpoints

Citation