Publication: Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations.
Loading...
Identifiers
Date
2022-04-22
Authors
Lunardi, Mattia
Louvard, Yves
Lefevre, Thierry
Stankovic, Goran
Burzotta, Francesco
Kassab, Ghassan S
Lassen, Jens Flensted
Darremont, Olivier
Garg, Scot
Koo, Bon-Kwon
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Europa Digital & Publishing
Abstract
The Bifurcation Academic Research Consortium (Bif-ARC) project originated from the need to overcome the paucity of standardization and comparability between studies involving bifurcation coronary lesions. This document is the result of a collaborative effort between academic research organizations and the most renowned interventional cardiology societies focused on bifurcation lesions in Europe, the United States, and Asia. This consensus provides standardized definitions for bifurcation lesions; the criteria to judge the side branch relevance; the procedural, mechanistic, and clinical endpoints for every type of bifurcation study; and the follow-up methods. Considering the complexity of bifurcation lesions and their evaluation, detailed instructions and technical aspects for site and core laboratory analysis of bifurcation lesions are also reported. The recommendations included within this consensus will facilitate pooled analyses and the effective comparison of data in the future, improving the clinical relevance of trials in bifurcation lesions, and the quality of care in this subset of patients.
Description
MeSH Terms
United States
Follow-Up Studies
Clinical Relevance
Heart
Cardiology
Follow-Up Studies
Clinical Relevance
Heart
Cardiology
DeCS Terms
Cardiología
Corazón
Estados Unidos
Estudios de seguimiento
Relevancia clínica
Corazón
Estados Unidos
Estudios de seguimiento
Relevancia clínica
CIE Terms
Keywords
Academic, Research, Consortium, Bifurcation, Clinical trials, Endpoints