Publication:
Lung Deposition and Inspiratory Flow Rate in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Different Inhalation Devices: A Systematic Literature Review and Expert Opinion.

dc.contributor.authorBaloira, Adolfo
dc.contributor.authorAbad, Araceli
dc.contributor.authorFuster, Antonia
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Rivero, Juan Luis
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Sidro, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorMárquez-Martín, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorPalop, Marta
dc.contributor.authorSoler, Néstor
dc.contributor.authorVelasco, J L
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Torralba, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T11:37:52Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T11:37:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-19
dc.description.abstractOur aim was to describe: 1) lung deposition and inspiratory flow rate; 2) main characteristics of inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to analyze the features and results of inhaler devices in COPD patients. These devices included pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and a soft mist inhaler (SMI). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established, as well as search strategies (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2019). In vitro and in vivo studies were included. Two reviewers selected articles, collected and analyzed data independently. Narrative searches complemented the SLR. We discussed the results of the reviews in a nominal group meeting and agreed on various general principles and recommendations. The SLR included 71 articles, some were of low-moderate quality, and there was great variability regarding populations and outcomes. Lung deposition rates varied across devices: 8%-53% for pMDIs, 7%-69% for DPIs, and 39%-67% for the SMI. The aerosol exit velocity was high with pMDIs (more than 3 m/s), while it is much slower (0.84-0.72 m/s) with the SMI. In general, pMDIs produce large-sized particles (1.22-8 μm), DPIs produce medium-sized particles (1.8-4.8 µm), and 60% of the particles reach an aerodynamic diameter Lung deposition and inspiratory flow rate are key factors when selecting an inhalation device in COPD patients.
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/COPD.S297980
dc.identifier.essn1178-2005
dc.identifier.pmcPMC8064620
dc.identifier.pmid33907390
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8064620/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.dovepress.com/getfile.php?fileID=68622
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/17644
dc.journal.titleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
dc.journal.titleabbreviationInt J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number1021-1033
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.pubmedtypeSystematic Review
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectCOPD
dc.subjectinhalation devices
dc.subjectinspiratory flow
dc.subjectlung deposition
dc.subjectsystematic literature review
dc.subject.meshAdministration, Inhalation
dc.subject.meshBronchodilator Agents
dc.subject.meshDry Powder Inhalers
dc.subject.meshEquipment Design
dc.subject.meshExpert Testimony
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshLung
dc.subject.meshMetered Dose Inhalers
dc.subject.meshPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
dc.titleLung Deposition and Inspiratory Flow Rate in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Different Inhalation Devices: A Systematic Literature Review and Expert Opinion.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number16
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC8064620.pdf
Size:
376.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format