Publication:
Skin adverse events related to personal protective equipment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

dc.contributor.authorMontero-Vilchez, T
dc.contributor.authorCuenca-Barrales, C
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Lopez, A
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Leyva, A
dc.contributor.authorArias-Santiago, S
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T11:39:53Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T11:39:53Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-29
dc.description.abstractSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a global pandemic that has spread all over the word. To avoid the virus transmission, healthcare workers must wear adequate personal protective equipment (PPE). PPE is associated with several side events, including skin reactions. The objective of this study was to summarize the prevalence, type and risk factors for cutaneous adverse events related to PPE and prevention measures to avoid them. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus and EMBASE databases from conception to 21 January 2021. All types of epidemiological studies regarding skin adverse events related to PPE were included. The literature search identified 1007 references, 35 of them met the eligible criteria and were included for analysis, representing 31 453 participants. The media of skin side events related to PPE was 75.13%. The rate of cutaneous adverse events related to mask was 57.71%, and those associated with gloves and hand hygiene products was 49.16%. Most common skin adverse events were contact dermatitis, acne and itching. The most damaged anatomical regions were the nasal bridge, the cheeks and the hands. The duration of PPE wearing was the most common risk factor. Frequent handwashing, gloves and masks were the agents most frequently related to skin reactions. N95 respirators were the most harmful mask type for the skin. Hydrocolloid use prevented from developing skin adverse events related to masks. In conclusion, the rate of cutaneous adverse events related to PPE use is high. A longer duration of PPE wearing was the most common risk factor. Using hydrocolloid could prevent from skin injuries related to mask use.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jdv.17436
dc.identifier.essn1468-3083
dc.identifier.pmid34077565
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jdv.17436
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/17944
dc.issue.number10
dc.journal.titleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV
dc.journal.titleabbreviationJ Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.organizationInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA)
dc.page.number1994-2006
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeMeta-Analysis
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.pubmedtypeSystematic Review
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.meshCOVID-19
dc.subject.meshHealth Personnel
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshPandemics
dc.subject.meshPersonal Protective Equipment
dc.subject.meshSARS-CoV-2
dc.titleSkin adverse events related to personal protective equipment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number35
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MonteroVilchez_Skin.pdf
Size:
264.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format