Publication:
Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.

dc.contributor.authorLongo-Muñoz, F
dc.contributor.authorArgiles, G
dc.contributor.authorTabernero, J
dc.contributor.authorCervantes, A
dc.contributor.authorGravalos, C
dc.contributor.authorPericay, C
dc.contributor.authorGil-Calle, S
dc.contributor.authorMizuguchi, H
dc.contributor.authorCarrato-Mena, A
dc.contributor.authorLimon, M L
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Carbonero, R
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T08:34:37Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T08:34:37Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-21
dc.description.abstractTAS-102 is a combination of the thymidine-based nucleoside analog trifluridine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil. Efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory or intolerant to standard therapies were evaluated in the phase 3 RECOURSE trial. Results of RECOURSE demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with TAS-102 versus placebo [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68 and 0.48 for OS and PFS, respectively; both P  Primary and key secondary endpoints were evaluated in a post hoc analysis of the RECOURSE Spanish subgroup, using univariate and multivariate analyses. Safety and tolerability were reported with descriptive statistics. The RECOURSE Spanish subgroup included 112 patients (mean age 61 years, 62 % male). Median OS was 6.8 months in the TAS-102 group (n = 80) versus 4.6 months in the placebo group (n = 32) [HR = 0.47; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.78; P = 0.0032). Median PFS was 2.0 months in the TAS-102 group and 1.7 months in the placebo group (HR = 0.47; 95 % CI: 0.30-0.74; P = 0.001). Eighty (100 %) TAS-102 versus 31 (96.9 %) placebo patients had adverse events (AEs). The most common drug-related ≥Grade 3 AE was neutropenia (40 % TAS-102 versus 0 % placebo). There was 1 (1.3 %) case of febrile neutropenia in the TAS-102 group versus none in the placebo group. In the RECOURSE Spanish subgroup, TAS-102 was associated with significantly improved OS and PFS versus placebo, consistent with the overall RECOURSE population. No new safety signals were identified.
dc.description.versionSi
dc.identifier.citationLongo-Muñoz F, Argiles G, Tabernero J, Cervantes A, Gravalos C, Pericay C, et al. Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial. Clin Transl Oncol. 2017 Feb;19(2):227-235
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12094-016-1528-7
dc.identifier.essn1699-3055
dc.identifier.pmcPMC5239803
dc.identifier.pmid27443414
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5239803/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12094-016-1528-7.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/10295
dc.issue.number2
dc.journal.titleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico
dc.journal.titleabbreviationClin Transl Oncol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Regional de Málaga
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number227-235
dc.provenanceRealizada la curación de contenido 28/03/2025
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.pubmedtypeClinical Trial, Phase III
dc.pubmedtypeComparative Study
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeMulticenter Study
dc.pubmedtypeRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-016-1528-7
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectFluoropyrimidine
dc.subjectMetastatic colorectal cancer
dc.subjectSpain
dc.subjectTAS-102
dc.subjectTipiracil hydrochloride
dc.subjectTrifluridine
dc.subject.decsAnálisis Multivariante
dc.subject.decsEstadística
dc.subject.decsEficacia
dc.subject.decsNeutropenia Febril
dc.subject.decsSupervivencia sin Progresión
dc.subject.decsNeoplasias Colorrectales
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over
dc.subject.meshAntiviral Agents
dc.subject.meshColorectal Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshDouble-Blind Method
dc.subject.meshDrug Combinations
dc.subject.meshDrug Therapy, Combination
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studies
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Staging
dc.subject.meshPalliative Care
dc.subject.meshPrognosis
dc.subject.meshPyrrolidines
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.subject.meshSurvival Rate
dc.subject.meshThymine
dc.subject.meshTrifluridine
dc.subject.meshUracil
dc.titleEfficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number19
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC5239803.pdf
Size:
1023.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format