Publication:
Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.

dc.contributor.authorKnox, Emily Caitlin Lily
dc.contributor.authorMateo-Rodríguez, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorDaponte-Codina, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRosell-Ortiz, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorSolá-Muñoz, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorCodina-Rodríguez, Antía
dc.contributor.authorBueno, Héctor
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Azpiazu, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Knox,ECL; Mateo-Rodriguez,I; Daponte-Codina,A] Andalusian School of Public Health, 18011 Granada, Spain.
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Knox,ECL; Mateo-Rodriguez,I; Daponte-Codina,A] CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Mateo-Rodriguez,I] Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional a Distancia (UNED), 28015 Madrid, Spain.
dc.contributor.funderMinistry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Madrid, Spain
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-13T08:58:33Z
dc.date.available2025-06-13T08:58:33Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-26
dc.description.abstractA systematic review was performed with the aim of analysing potential sex differences in the overall treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). : Studies published between January 2011 and November 2023 that conducted a sex-based analysis of the provision of any type of therapeutic measure to treat CHD were included. A search was performed of the Web of Science database in November 2023, resulting in 9070 articles. Study quality was examined using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A worksheet was produced to extract data pertaining to the title, year of publication, sample, context, study design, dependent variables, time-frame, treatment type, and outcomes reported by each article. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, and the research protocol was submitted to PROSPERO (CRD42022330238). : A total of 80 articles presenting data representing 560.070,624 individual datapoints were selected to comprise the final sample. The main findings revealed that the majority of studies highlighted inequalities that disadvantaged females in all analysed treatment categories (pharmacological treatment, invasive interventions, rehabilitation programmes, and other treatment types). : Despite the abundance of evidence on the need to improve healthcare provision to females with CHD, few studies examined the reasons or mechanisms underlying the inequalities identified.
dc.description.versionYes
dc.identifier.citationKnox ECL, Mateo-Rodríguez I, Daponte-Codina A, Rosell-Ortiz F, Solá-Muñoz S, Codina-Rodríguez A, et al. Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 26;14(5):1583
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm14051583
dc.identifier.essn2077-0383
dc.identifier.pmid40095519
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10668/28530
dc.issue.number5
dc.journal.titleJournal of clinical medicine
dc.language.isoen
dc.page.number1583.
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.projectIDPI19/00561
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/14/5/1583
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectcardiovascular
dc.subjectcoronary heart disease
dc.subjectgender
dc.subjectreview
dc.subjecttreatments
dc.subjectwomen
dc.subject.decsEnfermedad Coronaria
dc.subject.decsMujeres
dc.subject.decsGénero y Salud
dc.subject.decsRevisión Sistemática
dc.subject.meshCoronary Disease
dc.subject.meshGender and Health
dc.subject.meshWomen
dc.subject.meshSystematic Review
dc.titleGender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dc.volume.number14
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Knox_Gender.pdf
Size:
1.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format