Publication:
Dual-Chamber Pacing With Closed Loop Stimulation in Recurrent Reflex Vasovagal Syncope: The SPAIN Study.

dc.contributor.authorBaron-Esquivias, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorMorillo, Carlos A
dc.contributor.authorMoya-Mitjans, Angel
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Alday, Jesus
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Granell, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorLacunza-Ruiz, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Civera, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez-Carretero, Encarnacion
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Garrido, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T10:00:40Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T10:00:40Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractPacing in vasovagal syncope remains controversial. The authors evaluated dual-chamber pacing with closed loop stimulation (DDD-CLS) in patients with cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope. This randomized, double-blind, controlled study included Canadian and Spanish patients age ≥40 years, with high burden syncope (≥5 episodes, ≥2 episodes in the past year), and a cardioinhibitory head-up tilt test (bradycardia 3 s). Patients were randomized to either DDD-CLS pacing for 12 months followed by sham DDI mode pacing at 30 pulses/min for 12 months (group A), or sham DDI mode for 12 months followed by DDD-CLS pacing for 12 months (group B). Patients in both arms crossed-over after 12 months of follow-up or when a maximum of 3 syncopal episodes occurred within 1 month. A total of 46 patients completed the protocol; 22 were men (47.8%), and mean age was 56.30 ± 10.63 years. The mean number of previous syncopal episodes was 12 (range 9 to 20). The proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in the number of syncopal episodes was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47% to 90%) with DDD-CLS compared with 28% (95% CI: 9.7% to 53.5%) with sham DDI mode (p = 0.017). A total of 4 patients (8.7%) had events during DDD-CLS and 21 (45.7%) during sham DDI (hazard ratio: 6.7; 95% CI: 2.3 to 19.8). Kaplan-Meier curve was significantly different between groups in time to first syncope: 29.2 months (95% CI: 15.3 to 29.2 months) versus 9.3 months (95% CI: 6.21 months, NA; p  DDD-CLS pacing significantly reduced syncope burden and time to first recurrence by 7-fold, prolonging time to first syncope recurrence in patients age ≥40 years with head-up tilt test-induced vasovagal syncope compared with sham pacing. (Closed Loop Stimulation for Neuromediated Syncope [SPAIN Study]; NCT01621464).
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.026
dc.identifier.essn1558-3597
dc.identifier.pmid28958328
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.026
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/11621
dc.issue.number14
dc.journal.titleJournal of the American College of Cardiology
dc.journal.titleabbreviationJ Am Coll Cardiol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number1720-1728
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectasystole
dc.subjectpacemaker
dc.subjectsyncope
dc.subjecttilt table testing
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshBradycardia
dc.subject.meshCardiac Resynchronization Therapy
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshRecurrence
dc.subject.meshSeverity of Illness Index
dc.subject.meshSyncope, Vasovagal
dc.subject.meshTilt-Table Test
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleDual-Chamber Pacing With Closed Loop Stimulation in Recurrent Reflex Vasovagal Syncope: The SPAIN Study.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number70
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files