Publication:
Characterization and management of interaction risks between livestock and wild ungulates on outdoor pig farms in Spain.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2021-12-16

Authors

Jimenez-Ruiz, Saul
Laguna, Eduardo
Vicente, Joaquin
Garcia-Bocanegra, Ignacio
Martinez-Guijosa, Jordi
Cano-Terriza, David
Risalde, Maria A
Acevedo, Pelayo

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BioMed Central
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

To control the transmission of relevant shared diseases, such as animal tuberculosis (TB) and African swine fever (ASF), it is essential to reduce the risk of interaction between livestock and wild ungulates. In Eastern and Central Europe, the current spread of ASF virus affecting wild boar and domestic pigs (especially those raised outdoors and/or in backyards) has devastated the pig sector in affected regions and is seriously threatening other exporting countries. Here, we evaluated the risk of wildlife-livestock interactions on 45 outdoor pig farms in Spain, the second largest pork producer in the EU and then proposed biosecurity-related actions. An integrated, systematic wildlife risk mitigation protocol based on interviews, questionnaires and field audits was developed and applied on each farm. Most of the interaction risk points were associated with water sources (84.2%; 701/832), mainly springs and ponds, which accounted for almost all the specific points with high or very high risk scores. The risk of interaction at feeding points (6.9%; 57/832) and those associated with facilities for livestock and/or game management (8.9%; 74/832) were rated as low and very low risk, respectively. Wild boar were present and hunted on 69% of the farms. Supplementary feeding for wild ungulate species (mainly wild boar) was provided on almost half (48.9%; 22/45) the surveyed farms. Risk mitigation actions were categorised to target water access, waterers, food, other livestock species, grazing, wildlife, and offal disposal. Of the total number of actions (n = 2016), 82.7% were identified as priority actions while 17.3% represented alternative options which were identified less cost-effective. On average, 37.1 (median: 32; range 14-113) action proposals per study farm were made and 2.0 (median: 1; range 0-4) per risk point. The mean estimated cost of implementing the proposed priority actions was 14,780 €/farm (25.7 €/hectare and 799.4 €/risk point). This study expands the knowledge of interaction risks between domestic pigs and wild ungulates in outdoor pig farming systems and highlights the importance of considering local risks and management practices when designing and prioritising adapted wildlife risk mitigation and biosecurity actions. This practical and feasible protocol developed for Mediterranean ecosystems is easily transferable to professionals and can be adapted to extensive (outdoor) production or epidemiological systems in other European regions.

Description

MeSH Terms

Risk of species interaction
Standardised approach
Wild boar
Wildlife-livestock interface

DeCS Terms

Agricultura
Bioaseguramiento
Ciervos
Ganado

CIE Terms

Keywords

Biosecurity, Iberian pig, Outdoor farming, Red deer

Citation

Jiménez-Ruiz S, Laguna E, Vicente J, García-Bocanegra I, Martínez-Guijosa J, Cano-Terriza D, et al. Characterization and management of interaction risks between livestock and wild ungulates on outdoor pig farms in Spain. Porcine Health Manag. 2022 Jan 5;8(1):2