Publication:
Long-Term Follow-Up After Fat Graft Myringoplasty: Do Size and Location Matter?

dc.contributor.authorDiaz, Alfonso Rodriguez
dc.contributor.authorReina, Carlos O'Connor
dc.contributor.authorPlaza, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorPosadas, Elena Rodriguez
dc.contributor.authorArevalo, Francisco Valdeon
dc.contributor.authorIriarte, Maria Teresa Garcia
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T10:38:18Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T10:38:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-14
dc.description.abstractTo assess clinical and functional outcomes of a fat graft myringoplasty under local in an office setting. Prospective case series. Tertiary care facility. Patients with a tympanic membrane (TM) perforation presenting between December 2005 and June 2019. Inclusion criteria included perforation size >25% of the surface of the pars tensa of the TM, entire perforation margins visualized through a transcanal view, and lack of spontaneous closure at the 6-month follow-up. The exclusion criteria were the presence of cholesteatoma, wet appearance of the mucosa in the tympanic cavity, ear discharge in the 3 months before surgery, or signs of ossicular inconsistency. In-office fat graft myringoplasty technique under local anesthesia. Complete perforation closure rate and audiometric outcomes. A total of 121 patients underwent the procedure, of whom 21 had bilateral sequential procedures (total 142 ears). Average age was 51.1 ± 18.4 years (range, 3-78 years). The size of perforation was In office fat graft myringoplasty, in adult and pediatric patients with variable perforation sizes, is a well-tolerated procedure with very satisfactory clinical results.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0145561320973555
dc.identifier.essn1942-7522
dc.identifier.pmid33314958
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0145561320973555
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/16788
dc.issue.number3_suppl
dc.journal.titleEar, nose, & throat journal
dc.journal.titleabbreviationEar Nose Throat J
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
dc.organizationÁrea de Gestión Sanitaria de Osuna
dc.organizationAGS - Osuna
dc.page.number229S-234S
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectfat graft
dc.subjecthearing loss
dc.subjectmiddle ear surgery
dc.subjectoffice surgery
dc.subjecttympanoplasty
dc.subject.meshAdipose Tissue
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAmbulatory Surgical Procedures
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studies
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshMyringoplasty
dc.subject.meshNeck
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshTympanic Membrane
dc.subject.meshTympanic Membrane Perforation
dc.titleLong-Term Follow-Up After Fat Graft Myringoplasty: Do Size and Location Matter?
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number100
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files