Publication:
Quality of life, satisfaction and outcomes after ministernotomy versus full sternotomy isolated aortic valve replacement (QUALITY-AVR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Caulo, Emiliano A
dc.contributor.authorGuijarro-Contreras, Ana
dc.contributor.authorOtero-Forero, Juan
dc.contributor.authorMataró, María José
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Espín, Gemma
dc.contributor.authorGuzón, Arantza
dc.contributor.authorPorras, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorSuch, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorOrdóñez, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorMelero-Tejedor, José María
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Navarro, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T10:04:03Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T10:04:03Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-17
dc.description.abstractDuring the last decade, the use of ministernotomy in cardiac surgery has increased. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after ministernotomy have never been compared to conventional full sternotomy in randomised trials. The aim of the study is to determine if this minimally invasive approach improves quality of life, satisfaction and clinical morbimortality outcomes. The QUALITY-AVR trial is a single-blind, single-centre, independent, and pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing ministernotomy ("J" shaped upper hemisternotomy toward right 4th intercostal space) to full sternotomy in patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis scheduled for elective aortic valve replacement. One hundred patients will be randomised in a 1:1 computational fashion. Sample size was determined for the primary end point with alpha error of 0.05 and with power of 90% in detecting differences between intervention groups of ≥ 0.10 points in change from baseline quality of life Questionnaire EuroQOL-index (EQ-5D-5 L®), measured at 1, 6 or 12 months. Secondary endpoints are: the differences in change from other baseline EQ-5D-5 L® utilities (visual analogue scale, Health Index and Severity Index), cardiac surgery specific satisfaction questionnaire (SATISCORE®), a combined safety endpoint of four major adverse complications at 1 month (all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, neurologic events and acute renal failure), bleeding through drains within the first 24 h, intubation time, postoperative hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, transfusion needs during the first 72 h and 1-year survival rates. Clinical follow up is scheduled at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months after randomization. All clinical outcomes are recorded following the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria. The QUALITY-AVR trial aims to test the hypothesis that ministernotomy improves quality of life, satisfaction and clinical outcomes in patients referred for isolated aortic valve replacement. Statistically significant differences favouring ministernotomy could modify the surgical "gold standard" for aortic stenosis surgery, and subsequently the need to change the control group in transcatheter aortic valve implantation trials. Recruitment started on 18 March 2016. In November 2017, 75 patients were enrolled. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02726087 . Registered on 13 March 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-018-2486-x
dc.identifier.essn1745-6215
dc.identifier.pmcPMC5816540
dc.identifier.pmid29454380
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816540/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2486-x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/12149
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleTrials
dc.journal.titleabbreviationTrials
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
dc.organizationFundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud-FIMABIS
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number114
dc.pubmedtypeClinical Trial Protocol
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAortic stenosis
dc.subjectAortic valve replacement
dc.subjectClinical trials
dc.subjectMinisternotomy
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectSatisfaction
dc.subject.meshAortic Valve
dc.subject.meshAortic Valve Stenosis
dc.subject.meshHeart Valve Prosthesis
dc.subject.meshHeart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
dc.subject.meshPatient Satisfaction
dc.subject.meshPostoperative Complications
dc.subject.meshPragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
dc.subject.meshQuality of Life
dc.subject.meshSeverity of Illness Index
dc.subject.meshSingle-Blind Method
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.subject.meshSternotomy
dc.subject.meshSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.meshTime Factors
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleQuality of life, satisfaction and outcomes after ministernotomy versus full sternotomy isolated aortic valve replacement (QUALITY-AVR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number19
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC5816540.pdf
Size:
634.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format