Publication:
Multidisciplinary Consensus for the Management of Pulmonary Thromboembolism.

dc.contributor.authorLobo, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorAlonso, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorArenas, Juan
dc.contributor.authorDomènech, Pere
dc.contributor.authorEscribano, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Capitán, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorJara-Palomares, Luis
dc.contributor.authorJiménez, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorLázaro, María
dc.contributor.authorLecumberri, Ramón
dc.contributor.authorMonreal, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Artacho, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorJiménez, David
dc.contributor.authoren nombre del Panel Multidisciplinar para el Manejo de la TEP
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-03T14:44:05Z
dc.date.available2023-05-03T14:44:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-13
dc.description.abstractWe have updated recommendations on 12 controversial topics that were published in the 2013 National Consensus on the diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). A comprehensive review of the literature was performed for each topic, and each recommendation was evaluated in two teleconferences. For diagnosis, we recommend against using the Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out Criteria (PERC) rule as the only test to rule out PE, and we recommend using a D-dimer cutoff adjusted to age to rule out PE. We suggest using computed tomography pulmonary angiogram as the imaging test of choice for the majority of patients with suspected PE. We recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (over vitamin K antagonists) for the vast majority of patients with acute PE, and we suggest using anticoagulation for patients with isolated subsegmental PE. We recommend against inserting an inferior cava filter for the majority of patients with PE, and we recommend using full-dose systemic thrombolytic therapy for PE patients requiring reperfusion. The decision to stop anticoagulants at 3 months or to treat indefinitely mainly depends on the presence (or absence) and type of risk factor for venous thromboembolism, and we recommend against thrombophilia testing to decide duration of anticoagulation. Finally, we suggest against extensive screening for occult cancer in patients with PE.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arbres.2021.01.031
dc.identifier.essn1579-2129
dc.identifier.pmid33714657
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/21980
dc.issue.number3
dc.journal.titleArchivos de bronconeumologia
dc.journal.titleabbreviationArch Bronconeumol
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.isoes
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number246-254
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectDiagnóstico
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectPronóstico
dc.subjectPulmonary embolism
dc.subjectTratamiento
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.subjectTromboembolia de pulmón
dc.titleMultidisciplinary Consensus for the Management of Pulmonary Thromboembolism.
dc.title.alternativeConsenso multidisciplinar para el manejo de la tromboembolia de pulmón.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.volume.number58
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files