Publication:
ALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis.

dc.contributor.authorBosch, E
dc.contributor.authorEspinós, J J
dc.contributor.authorFabregues, F
dc.contributor.authorFontes, J
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Velasco, J
dc.contributor.authorLlácer, J
dc.contributor.authorRequena, A
dc.contributor.authorCheca, M A
dc.contributor.authorBellver, J
dc.contributor.authorSpanish Infertility SWOT Group (SISG)
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T09:36:01Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T09:36:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-24
dc.description.abstractIntracytroplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) is a common procedure used to improve reproductive results, even among couples without male factor infertility. However, the evidence available is still uncertain on the possible advantages and deficiencies that this procedure may have in patients with no formal indication for ICSI. A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis examines the possible advantages and deficiencies of performing ICSI in these patients with no formal indication. The evidence suggests that ICSI is not justified for non-male factor infertile couples requiring in vitro conception. One of the major strengths associated to the procedure is the virtual elimination of cases further complicated by total fertilization failure and a combination between IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes has been advised in the literature. Greater technical difficulties, higher costs and performing an unnecessary invasive technique in some cases represent some of the weaknesses of the procedure, and questions regarding safety issues should not be ruled out. Despite the widespread use of ICSI in patients without a formal diagnosis of male factor infertility, evidence demonstrating its effectiveness in this population is still lacking. Additional large and well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify definitive indications for ICSI in non-male factor infertility.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10815-020-01836-0
dc.identifier.essn1573-7330
dc.identifier.pmcPMC7492350
dc.identifier.pmid32578032
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7492350/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7492350
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/15811
dc.issue.number9
dc.journal.titleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics
dc.journal.titleabbreviationJ Assist Reprod Genet
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.page.number2081-2092
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectAssisted reproduction
dc.subjectIn vitro fertilization (IVF)
dc.subjectInfertility
dc.subjectIntracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectSevere non-male factor
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshEmbryo Transfer
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshFertilization in Vitro
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshInfertility, Male
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshOocytes
dc.subject.meshPregnancy
dc.subject.meshPregnancy Rate
dc.subject.meshSemen
dc.subject.meshSperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
dc.subject.meshSpermatozoa
dc.titleALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number37
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files