Publication:
Antipruritic vs. Antitumour Action of Aprepitant: A Question of Dose.

dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorParrilla, Julio
dc.contributor.authorRosso, Marisa
dc.contributor.authorCoveñas, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T10:30:27Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T10:30:27Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-08
dc.description.abstractA recently published study of 8 patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) treated with aprepitant (1) reported that the neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) antago-nist aprepitant did not completely modify CTCL disease activity. The authors concluded that these findings do not support future research focused on the anti-lymphoma action of NK-1R antagonists (1). The same group publi-shed another study of 17 patients, which reported that, in primary CTCL, there was an improvement in refractory pruritus, and that aprepitant was safe, well-tolerated and effective for treatment of severe chronic itch in patients with CTCL who failed to respond to classical antipruritic treatments (2). The latter study is in agreement with the data suggesting that, in the skin, NK-1R antagonists play an important role in anti-itch activity (2). These authors reported that the best antipruritic response was found in lymphomas limited to skin (stages IB–IIB) and non-erythroderma cutaneous lesions (stage T4) (2). In both studies (1, 2), aprepitant (standard 125–80–80 mg) was administered every 2 weeks for a mean of 20 weeks, or weekly for 8 weeks. In standard clinical practice, apre-pitant (first day 125 mg; second day 80 mg; third day 80 mg) is used to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
dc.description.versionSi
dc.identifier.citationMuñoz M, Parrilla J, Rosso M, Coveñas R. Antipruritic vs. Antitumour Action of Aprepitant: A Question of Dose. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019 May 1;99(6):620-621.
dc.identifier.doi10.2340/00015555-3148
dc.identifier.essn1651-2057
dc.identifier.pmid30734049
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.medicaljournals.se/acta/download/10.2340/00015555-3148/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/13534
dc.issue.number6
dc.journal.titleActa dermato-venereologica
dc.journal.titleabbreviationActa Derm Venereol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBIS
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number620-621
dc.provenanceRealizada la curación de contenido 13/03/2025
dc.publisherMedical Journals Sweden AB
dc.pubmedtypeLetter
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3148
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents
dc.subjectDose-Response Relationship, Drug
dc.subjectLymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous
dc.subjectSkin Neoplasms
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.decsAprepitant
dc.subject.decsLinfoma
dc.subject.decsAntipruriginosos
dc.subject.decsQuimioterapia
dc.subject.decsLinfocitos T
dc.subject.decsDermatitis exfoliativa
dc.subject.decsPrurito
dc.subject.decsInvestigación
dc.subject.decsReceptores de Neuroquinina-1
dc.subject.decsNáusea
dc.subject.decsEnfermedad
dc.subject.meshAntipruritics
dc.subject.meshAprepitant
dc.subject.meshDrug Administration Schedule
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshNeurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
dc.subject.meshPruritus
dc.titleAntipruritic vs. Antitumour Action of Aprepitant: A Question of Dose.
dc.typeletter
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number99
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Muñoz_AntipruriticVs..pdf
Size:
226.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format