Publication:
Circulating vitamin D levels and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis and systematic review of case-control and prospective cohort studies.

dc.contributor.authorHernández-Alonso, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorBoughanem, Hatim
dc.contributor.authorCanudas, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorBecerra-Tomás, Nerea
dc.contributor.authorFernández de la Puente, María
dc.contributor.authorBabio, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorMacias-Gonzalez, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorSalas-Salvadó, Jordi
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T11:42:43Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T11:42:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-05
dc.description.abstractThe associations between circulating vitamin D concentrations and total and site-specific colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence have been examined in several epidemiological studies with overall inconclusive findings. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of both case-control and prospective cohort studies was to evaluate the association between CRC and circulating levels of vitamin D. The main exposure and outcome were circulating total 25(OH)D and CRC, respectively, in the overall population (i.e., all subjects). Two reviewers, working independently, screened all the literature available to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria (e.g., case-control or prospective cohort studies, published in English, and excluding non-original papers). Data were pooled by the generic inverse variance method using a random or fixed effect model, as approriate. Heterogeneity was identified using the Cochran's Q-test and quantified by the I2 statistic. Results were stratified by study design, sex, and metabolite of vitamin D. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also performed. A total of 28 original studies were included for the quantitative meta-analysis. Meta-analyses comparing the highest vs lowest categories, showed a 39% lower risk between levels of total 25(OH)D and CRC risk (OR (95% CI): 0.61 (0.52; 0.71); 11 studies) in case-control studies; whereas a 20% reduced CRC risk in prospective cohort studies (HR (95% CI): 0.80 (0.66; 0.97); 6 studies). Results in women mirrored main results, whereas results in men were non-significant in both analyses. Our findings support an inverse association between circulating vitamin D levels and CRC risk.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10408398.2021.1939649
dc.identifier.essn1549-7852
dc.identifier.pmid34224246
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10408398.2021.1939649?needAccess=true
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/18163
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleCritical reviews in food science and nutrition
dc.journal.titleabbreviationCrit Rev Food Sci Nutr
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
dc.organizationInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA
dc.page.number1-17
dc.pubmedtypeSystematic Review
dc.pubmedtypeMeta-Analysis
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectcolon cancer
dc.subjectcolorectal cancer
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectrectal cancer
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjectvitamin D
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshVitamin D
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshColorectal Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshVitamins
dc.subject.meshCase-Control Studies
dc.titleCirculating vitamin D levels and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis and systematic review of case-control and prospective cohort studies.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number63
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files