Publication:
30-day morbidity and mortality of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one anastomosis gastric bypass: a propensity score-matched analysis of the GENEVA data.

dc.contributor.authorSinghal, Rishi
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Victor Roth
dc.contributor.authorWiggins, Tom
dc.contributor.authorSuper, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorLudwig, Christian
dc.contributor.authorGkoutos, Georgios V
dc.contributor.authorMahawar, Kamal
dc.contributor.authorGENEVA Collaborators
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-03T15:23:14Z
dc.date.available2023-05-03T15:23:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-15
dc.description.abstractThere is a paucity of data comparing 30-day morbidity and mortality of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). This study aimed to compare the 30-day safety of SG, RYGB, and OAGB in propensity score-matched cohorts. This analysis utilised data collected from the GENEVA study which was a multicentre observational cohort study of bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) in 185 centres across 42 countries between 01/05/2022 and 31/10/2020 during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. 30-day complications were categorised according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Patients receiving SG, RYGB, or OAGB were propensity-matched according to baseline characteristics and 30-day complications were compared between groups. In total, 6770 patients (SG 3983; OAGB 702; RYGB 2085) were included in this analysis. Prior to matching, RYGB was associated with highest 30-day complication rate (SG 5.8%; OAGB 7.5%; RYGB 8.0% (p = 0.006)). On multivariate regression modelling, Insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolaemia were associated with increased 30-day complications. Being a non-smoker was associated with reduced complication rates. When compared to SG as a reference category, RYGB, but not OAGB, was associated with an increased rate of 30-day complications. A total of 702 pairs of SG and OAGB were propensity score-matched. The complication rate in the SG group was 7.3% (n = 51) as compared to 7.5% (n = 53) in the OAGB group (p = 0.68). Similarly, 2085 pairs of SG and RYGB were propensity score-matched. The complication rate in the SG group was 6.1% (n = 127) as compared to 7.9% (n = 166) in the RYGB group (p = 0.09). And, 702 pairs of OAGB and RYGB were matched. The complication rate in both groups was the same at 7.5 % (n = 53; p = 0.07). This global study found no significant difference in the 30-day morbidity and mortality of SG, RYGB, and OAGB in propensity score-matched cohorts.
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41366-021-01048-1
dc.identifier.essn1476-5497
dc.identifier.pmcPMC8671878
dc.identifier.pmid34912046
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671878/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41366-021-01048-1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/22597
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleInternational journal of obesity (2005)
dc.journal.titleabbreviationInt J Obes (Lond)
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
dc.page.number750-757
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeObservational Study
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.meshCOVID-19
dc.subject.meshDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2
dc.subject.meshGastrectomy
dc.subject.meshGastric Bypass
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMorbidity
dc.subject.meshObesity, Morbid
dc.subject.meshPropensity Score
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studies
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.title30-day morbidity and mortality of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one anastomosis gastric bypass: a propensity score-matched analysis of the GENEVA data.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number46
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC8671878.pdf
Size:
567.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format