Publication:
Rationalizing antimicrobial therapy in the ICU: a narrative review.

dc.contributor.authorTimsit, Jean-François
dc.contributor.authorBassetti, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorCremer, Olaf
dc.contributor.authorDaikos, George
dc.contributor.authorde Waele, Jan
dc.contributor.authorKallil, Andre
dc.contributor.authorKipnis, Eric
dc.contributor.authorKollef, Marin
dc.contributor.authorLaupland, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorPaiva, Jose-Artur
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Baño, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorRuppé, Étienne
dc.contributor.authorSalluh, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorTaccone, Fabio Silvio
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorBarbier, François
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T10:28:26Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T10:28:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-18
dc.description.abstractThe massive consumption of antibiotics in the ICU is responsible for substantial ecological side effects that promote the dissemination of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) in this environment. Strikingly, up to half of ICU patients receiving empirical antibiotic therapy have no definitively confirmed infection, while de-escalation and shortened treatment duration are insufficiently considered in those with documented sepsis, highlighting the potential benefit of implementing antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) and other quality improvement initiatives. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the available evidence, emerging options, and unsolved controversies for the optimization of antibiotic therapy in the ICU. Published data notably support the need for better identification of patients at risk of MDRB infection, more accurate diagnostic tools enabling a rule-in/rule-out approach for bacterial sepsis, an individualized reasoning for the selection of single-drug or combination empirical regimen, the use of adequate dosing and administration schemes to ensure the attainment of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics targets, concomitant source control when appropriate, and a systematic reappraisal of initial therapy in an attempt to minimize collateral damage on commensal ecosystems through de-escalation and treatment-shortening whenever conceivable. This narrative review also aims at compiling arguments for the elaboration of actionable ASP in the ICU, including improved patient outcomes and a reduction in antibiotic-related selection pressure that may help to control the dissemination of MDRB in this healthcare setting.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00134-019-05520-5
dc.identifier.essn1432-1238
dc.identifier.pmid30659311
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00134-019-05520-5.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/13434
dc.issue.number2
dc.journal.titleIntensive care medicine
dc.journal.titleabbreviationIntensive Care Med
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBIS
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
dc.page.number172-189
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectAntibiotic stewardship
dc.subjectAntimicrobial resistance
dc.subjectCarbapenem
dc.subjectCritical illness
dc.subjectEmpirical therapy
dc.subjectOutcome
dc.subjectSepsis
dc.subject.meshAnti-Infective Agents
dc.subject.meshAntimicrobial Stewardship
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIntensive Care Units
dc.subject.meshMedical Overuse
dc.subject.meshRationalization
dc.subject.meshRisk Factors
dc.titleRationalizing antimicrobial therapy in the ICU: a narrative review.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number45
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files