Publication:
Specific allergen immunotherapy for the treatment of atopic eczema: a Cochrane systematic review.

dc.contributor.authorTam, H H
dc.contributor.authorCalderon, M A
dc.contributor.authorManikam, L
dc.contributor.authorNankervis, H
dc.contributor.authorNúñez, I G
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, H C
dc.contributor.authorDurham, S R
dc.contributor.authorBoyle, R J
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T08:32:33Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T08:32:33Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-22
dc.description.abstractSpecific allergen immunotherapy (SIT) is an effective allergy treatment, but it is unclear whether SIT is effective for atopic eczema (AE). We undertook a systematic review to assess SIT efficacy and safety for treating AE. We searched databases, ongoing clinical trials registers, and conference proceedings up to July 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SIT using standardized allergen extracts, compared with placebo/control, for treating AE in patients with allergic sensitization were eligible. We identified 12 eligible trials with 733 participants. Interventions included subcutaneous (six trials), sublingual (four trials), oral or intradermal SIT in children/adults allergic to house dust mite (10 trials), grass pollen or other inhalants. Risk of bias was moderate, with high loss to follow-up and nonblinding as the main concerns. For our primary outcomes, three studies (208 participants) reported no significant difference - patient-reported global disease severity improvement RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.45, 1.26); and eczema symptoms mean difference -0.74 on a 20-point scale (95% CI -1.98, 0.50). Two studies (85 participants) reported a significant difference - SIT improved global disease severity RR 2.85 (95% CI 1.02, 7.96); and itch mean difference -4.20 on a 10-point scale (95% CI -3.69, -4.71). Meta-analysis was limited due to extreme statistical heterogeneity. For some secondary outcomes, meta-analyses showed benefits for SIT, for example investigator-rated improvement in eczema severity RR 1.48 (95% CI 1.16, 1.88; six trials, 262 participants). We found no evidence of adverse effects. The overall quality of evidence was low. We found no consistent evidence that SIT is effective for treating AE, but due to the low quality of evidence further research is needed to establish whether SIT has a role in AE treatment.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/all.12932
dc.identifier.essn1398-9995
dc.identifier.pmid27184158
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10056590/1/Manikam%20Herman%20et%20al.%20Allergy%202016.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/10087
dc.issue.number9
dc.journal.titleAllergy
dc.journal.titleabbreviationAllergy
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Regional de Málaga
dc.page.number1345-56
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeMeta-Analysis
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.pubmedtypeSystematic Review
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectatopic eczema
dc.subjecteczema
dc.subjectimmunotherapy
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subject.meshAllergens
dc.subject.meshCombined Modality Therapy
dc.subject.meshDermatitis, Atopic
dc.subject.meshDesensitization, Immunologic
dc.subject.meshEczema
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshPublication Bias
dc.subject.meshQuality of Life
dc.subject.meshSeverity of Illness Index
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleSpecific allergen immunotherapy for the treatment of atopic eczema: a Cochrane systematic review.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionSMUR
dc.volume.number71
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files