Publication:
Intraocular pressure responses to walking with surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

dc.contributor.authorJanicijevic, Danica
dc.contributor.authorRedondo, Beatríz
dc.contributor.authorJiménez, Raimundo
dc.contributor.authorLacorzana, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Ramos, Amador
dc.contributor.authorVera, Jesús
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T10:50:40Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T10:50:40Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-06
dc.description.abstractThe use of face mask is globally recommended as a preventive measure against COVID-19. However, the intraocular pressure (IOP) changes caused by face masks remain unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of wearing surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks during a 400-m walking protocol on IOP in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. Thirteen subjects diagnosed of POAG (21 eyes) were enrolled in this study. IOP was measured at baseline, during the 400-m walking protocol and after 5 min of passive recovery while POAG patients wore a surgical mask, FFP2/N95 mask and no mask in randomized order. From the 21 POAG eyes, we analyzed the IOP changes caused by physical exercise with two face masks and without wearing any face mask. At rest (baseline and recovery measurements), the use of the different face masks did not affect IOP levels (mean differences ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 mmHg). During physical activity, wearing an FFP2/N95 mask caused a small (mean differences ranging from 1 to 2 mmHg), but statistically significant, IOP rise in comparison to both the surgical mask and control conditions (Cohen's d = 0.63 and 0.83, respectively). Face masks must be used to minimize the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and POAG patients can safely use FFP2/N95 and surgical masks at rest. However, due to the IOP rise observed while walking with the FFP2/N95 mask, when possible, POAG patients should prioritized the use of surgical masks during physical activity.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00417-021-05159-3
dc.identifier.essn1435-702X
dc.identifier.pmcPMC8023773
dc.identifier.pmid33825030
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023773/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00417-021-05159-3.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/17536
dc.issue.number8
dc.journal.titleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
dc.journal.titleabbreviationGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.page.number2373-2378
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectGlaucoma management
dc.subjectPhysical exercise
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2
dc.subject.meshCOVID-19
dc.subject.meshGlaucoma, Open-Angle
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIntraocular Pressure
dc.subject.meshMasks
dc.subject.meshN95 Respirators
dc.subject.meshSARS-CoV-2
dc.subject.meshWalking
dc.titleIntraocular pressure responses to walking with surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number259
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC8023773.pdf
Size:
442.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format