Publication: Oportunidades de mejora del servicio de metadona en atención primaria, desde el punto de vista profesional
Loading...
Identifiers
Date
2010-03
Authors
Rodriguez Reinado, Carmen
Millán Carrasco, Almudena
Venegas Sánchez, Jesús
March Cerdá, Joan Carles
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sociedad Científica Española de Estudios sobre el Alcohol, el Alcoholismo y las otras Toxicomanías
Abstract
Objetivo: Identificar y priorizar las oportunidades de mejora, según el modelo European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM), del servicio de dispensación de metadona en los Centros de Atención Primaria (CAP) en Andalucía desde la perspectiva de los/as profesionales. Metodología: Método de consenso Delphi, a través de tres rondas de entrevistas con cuestionario administrado por correo electrónico a 39 profesionales durante septiembre de 2007 a marzo de 2008. Se configuró un panel de expertos/as formado por: Dispensadores/as y Prescriptores/ as de metadona así como Coordinadores/as de dispositivos asistenciales del Programa de Tratamiento con Metadona (PTM). Criterios de selección: Estar activo laboralmente y tener una experiencia de al menos 3 años. Variables de diversificación muestral en la composición del panel: Rol profesional, ámbito geográfico y tipo de hábitat. Captación: A través de profesionales claves de distintas instituciones. Resultados: En total se identificaron 48 oportunidades de mejoras. Trece oportunidades obtuvieron un nivel de acuerdo alto en la última ronda. Los criterios, según el modelo EFQM, que obtuvieron un mayor consenso para mejorar la atención fueron: Liderazgo, Alianzas y Recursos. Y la dimensión que obtuvo un mayor desacuerdo fue Procesos. Conclusiones: A pesar de su implementación desde 1997 en los CAP en Andalucía, el servicio de dispensación de metadona se encuentra en una fase de despliegue más que de perfeccionamiento.
Objective: To identify and prioritize improvement opportunities, according to the European Foundation for Quality Management model (EFQM) model, of the methadone dispensing service in Andalusian Primary Health Care, from the point of view of professionals. Method: Delphi consensus method, implemented from September 2007 to March 2008 by means of three rounds of interviews with questionnaires administered by electronic mail to 39 professionals. The Panel of experts was made up of Dispensers and Prescribers of methadone as well as Coordinators of welfare services from the Methadone Treatment Program (MTP). Selection criteria were: Being in active employment with a minimum of 3 years experience. Sample diversification variables: Professional role, geographical environment and type of habitat. Recruitment: By means of key professional bodies from different institutions. Results: 48 improvement opportunities were identified. Thirteen of these obtained a high level of agreement in the final round. According to the EFQM model, the dimensions that obtained the most consensus in relation to improving the care service were: Leadership, Alliances and Resources. The dimension that caused the greatest disagreement was Processes. Conclusions: In spite of its having been implemented since 1997 in Andalusian Primary Health Care, the methadone dispensing service is at an implementation phase, rather than what could be classed as a fully deployed stage
Objective: To identify and prioritize improvement opportunities, according to the European Foundation for Quality Management model (EFQM) model, of the methadone dispensing service in Andalusian Primary Health Care, from the point of view of professionals. Method: Delphi consensus method, implemented from September 2007 to March 2008 by means of three rounds of interviews with questionnaires administered by electronic mail to 39 professionals. The Panel of experts was made up of Dispensers and Prescribers of methadone as well as Coordinators of welfare services from the Methadone Treatment Program (MTP). Selection criteria were: Being in active employment with a minimum of 3 years experience. Sample diversification variables: Professional role, geographical environment and type of habitat. Recruitment: By means of key professional bodies from different institutions. Results: 48 improvement opportunities were identified. Thirteen of these obtained a high level of agreement in the final round. According to the EFQM model, the dimensions that obtained the most consensus in relation to improving the care service were: Leadership, Alliances and Resources. The dimension that caused the greatest disagreement was Processes. Conclusions: In spite of its having been implemented since 1997 in Andalusian Primary Health Care, the methadone dispensing service is at an implementation phase, rather than what could be classed as a fully deployed stage
Description
MeSH Terms
Medical Subject Headings::Chemicals and Drugs::Organic Chemicals::Ketones::Methadone
Medical Subject Headings::Health Care::Health Services Administration::Patient Care Management::Comprehensive Health Care::Primary Health Care
Medical Subject Headings::Health Care::Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation::Quality of Health Care
Medical Subject Headings::Health Care::Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation::Delivery of Health Care::Attitude of Health Personnel
Medical Subject Headings::Health Care::Health Services Administration::Patient Care Management::Comprehensive Health Care::Primary Health Care
Medical Subject Headings::Health Care::Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation::Quality of Health Care
Medical Subject Headings::Health Care::Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation::Delivery of Health Care::Attitude of Health Personnel
DeCS Terms
CIE Terms
Keywords
Programa de tratamiento con metadona, Mejora de la calidad asistencial, Modelo EFQM, Método Delphi, Methadone Treatment Program,, Welfare quality improvement, EFQM model, Delphi consensus method
Citation
Rodríguez Reinado C, Millán Carrasco A, Venegas Sánchez J, March Cerdá JC. Oportunidades de mejora del servicio de metadona en atención primaria, desde el punto de vista profesional. Adicciones. 2010; 22 (3) :207-15