Publication:
Contact sensitization to limonene and linalool hydroperoxides in Spain: a GEIDAC* prospective study.

dc.contributor.authorDeza, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Bravo, Begoña
dc.contributor.authorSilvestre, Juan F
dc.contributor.authorPastor-Nieto, Maria A
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Pérez, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorHeras-Mendaza, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorMercader, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Redondo, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorNiklasson, Bo
dc.contributor.authorGiménez-Arnau, Ana M
dc.contributor.authorGEIDAC
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T09:42:30Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T09:42:30Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-29
dc.description.abstractLimonene and linalool are common fragrance terpenes widely used in cosmetic, household and hygiene products. Their primary oxidation products formed after air exposure, the hydroperoxides, have been recognized as important contact haptens. To investigate the prevalence of contact allergy to hydroperoxides of limonene (Lim-OOHs) and hydroperoxides of linalool (Lin-OOHs) in Spain, and to define the optimal concentration for screening in consecutive patients. Three different concentrations of Lim-OOHs (0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% pet.) and Lin-OOHs (0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0% pet.) were simultaneously tested in 3639 consecutive patients at 22 departments of dermatology in Spain. Lim-OOHs at 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% yielded positive patch test reactions in 1.4%, 3.4% and 5.1% of the tested patients, respectively; and Lin-OOHs at 0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0% yielded positive reactions in 1.3%, 2.9% and 4.9% of the tested patients, respectively. Few irritant (1.5-1.9%) and doubtful reactions (0.4-0.5%) to both terpene hydroperoxides were registered at the highest concentrations tested. Lim-OOHs and Lin-OOHs can be considered as common causes of contact allergy, and their inclusion in an extended baseline patch test series therefore seems to be appropriate. The patch test preparations of Lim-OOHs 0.3% pet. and Lin-OOHs 1.0% pet. are useful tools for screening of contact sensitization.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cod.12714
dc.identifier.essn1600-0536
dc.identifier.pmid27896835
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttp://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/33527/1/deza-cod-cont.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/10649
dc.issue.number2
dc.journal.titleContact dermatitis
dc.journal.titleabbreviationContact Dermatitis
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
dc.page.number74-80
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectallergic contact dermatitis
dc.subjectfragrance allergy
dc.subjecthydroperoxides
dc.subjectlimonene
dc.subjectlinalool
dc.subject.meshAcyclic Monoterpenes
dc.subject.meshAdolescent
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over
dc.subject.meshCyclohexenes
dc.subject.meshDermatitis, Allergic Contact
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshHydrogen Peroxide
dc.subject.meshLimonene
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshMonoterpenes
dc.subject.meshOxidation-Reduction
dc.subject.meshPatch Tests
dc.subject.meshPerfume
dc.subject.meshPrevalence
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.subject.meshTerpenes
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult
dc.titleContact sensitization to limonene and linalool hydroperoxides in Spain: a GEIDAC* prospective study.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dc.volume.number76
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files