Publication:
Treatment options for relapse after autograft in multiple myeloma - report from an EBMT educational meeting.

dc.contributor.authorGarderet, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorCook, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorAuner, Holger W
dc.contributor.authorBruno, Benedetto
dc.contributor.authorLokhorst, Henk
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Simon, Jose Antonio
dc.contributor.authorSahebi, Firoozeh
dc.contributor.authorScheid, Christof
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Curly
dc.contributor.authorvan Biezen, Anja
dc.contributor.authorSobh, Mohamad
dc.contributor.authorMichallet, Mauricette
dc.contributor.authorGahrton, Gösta
dc.contributor.authorSchönland, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorKröger, Nicolaus
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T08:36:53Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T08:36:53Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-21
dc.description.abstractMajor improvements have been made in the treatment of myeloma. However, all patients, perhaps with some exceptions, eventually relapse, even after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In that setting, the combinations of new drugs, namely the IMiDs and the proteasome inhibitors along with steroids, give encouraging results in relapsed patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) is 20 months with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone plus ixazomib and 26 months with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone plus carfilzomib. Monoclonal antibodies have emerged as an additional new treatment option. The antibody anti-SLAMF7, elotuzumab, in combination with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone gives a median PFS of 20 months. The antibody daratumumab, targeting CD38, alone has an outstanding activity in previously heavily treated patients. Its use in combination is ongoing. Transplantation remains a major treatment option. For patients who relapse at least 18 months from the initial ASCT, a second ASCT can be performed with an expected time to progression of 19 months from the time of transplantation. For patients relapsing earlier and/or with high-risk characteristics and who are still chemosensitive, with a suitable donor, an allogeneic transplantation can be considered. The optimal treatment combination and sequence remain to be determined.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10428194.2016.1228926
dc.identifier.essn1029-2403
dc.identifier.pmid27650125
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://iris.unito.it/bitstream/2318/1610841/1/261027.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/10465
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleLeukemia & lymphoma
dc.journal.titleabbreviationLeuk Lymphoma
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBIS
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number797-808
dc.pubmedtypeCongress
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectMyeloma
dc.subjectallogeneic stem cell transplantation
dc.subjectautologous stem cell transplantation
dc.subjectimmunomodulatory drugs
dc.subjectmonoclonal antibodies
dc.subjectproteasome inhibitors
dc.subjectrelapse
dc.subject.meshCombined Modality Therapy
dc.subject.meshHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMultiple Myeloma
dc.subject.meshRecurrence
dc.subject.meshRetreatment
dc.subject.meshTransplantation, Autologous
dc.titleTreatment options for relapse after autograft in multiple myeloma - report from an EBMT educational meeting.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionSMUR
dc.volume.number58
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files