Publication:
Second-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331☆.

dc.contributor.authorSpigel, D R
dc.contributor.authorVicente, D
dc.contributor.authorCiuleanu, T E
dc.contributor.authorGettinger, S
dc.contributor.authorPeters, S
dc.contributor.authorHorn, L
dc.contributor.authorAudigier-Valette, C
dc.contributor.authorPardo Aranda, N
dc.contributor.authorJuan-Vidal, O
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Y
dc.contributor.authorZhang, H
dc.contributor.authorShi, M
dc.contributor.authorLuft, A
dc.contributor.authorWolf, J
dc.contributor.authorAntonia, S
dc.contributor.authorNakagawa, K
dc.contributor.authorFairchild, J
dc.contributor.authorBaudelet, C
dc.contributor.authorPandya, D
dc.contributor.authorDoshi, P
dc.contributor.authorChang, H
dc.contributor.authorReck, M
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T10:41:08Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T10:41:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-01
dc.description.abstractPatients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have few treatment options and dismal survival. Phase I/II data show activity of nivolumab in previously treated SCLC. CheckMate 331 is a randomized, open-label, phase III trial of nivolumab versus standard chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. Patients with relapse after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks or chemotherapy (topotecan or amrubicin) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Overall, 284 patients were randomized to nivolumab and 285 to chemotherapy. Minimum follow-up was 15.8 months. No significant improvement in OS was seen with nivolumab versus chemotherapy [median OS, 7.5 versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.04; P = 0.11]. A survival benefit with nivolumab was suggested in patients with baseline lactate dehydrogenase ≤ upper limit of normal and in those without baseline liver metastases. OS (nivolumab versus chemotherapy) was similar in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1% versus Nivolumab did not improve survival versus chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. No new safety signals were seen. In exploratory analyses, select baseline characteristics were associated with improved OS for nivolumab.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annonc.2021.01.071
dc.identifier.essn1569-8041
dc.identifier.pmid33539946
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttp://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923753421000995/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/17105
dc.issue.number5
dc.journal.titleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
dc.journal.titleabbreviationAnn Oncol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
dc.page.number631-641
dc.pubmedtypeClinical Trial, Phase III
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectPD-1
dc.subjectbiomarkers
dc.subjectimmunotherapy
dc.subjectsmall-cell lung cancer
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshLung Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Recurrence, Local
dc.subject.meshNivolumab
dc.subject.meshProgression-Free Survival
dc.subject.meshSmall Cell Lung Carcinoma
dc.titleSecond-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331☆.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number32
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files