Publication:
Randomized, double-blind study comparing percutaneous electrolysis and dry needling for the management of temporomandibular myofascial pain.

dc.contributor.authorLopez-Martos, R
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Perez, L-M
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Canela-Mendez, P
dc.contributor.authorUrresti-Lopez, F-J
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez-Perez, J-L
dc.contributor.authorInfante-Cossio, P
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T10:20:30Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T10:20:30Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-01
dc.description.abstractTo assess whether the techniques of percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) and deep dry needling (DDN) used on trigger points (TrP) of lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM) can significantly reduce pain and improve function in patients with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) compared to a control group treated with a sham needling procedure (SNP). Sixty patients diagnosed with MPS in the LPM were selected and randomly assigned to one of three groups. The PNE group received electrolysis to the LPM via transcutaneous puncture. The DDN group received a deep puncture to the TrP without the introduction of any substance. In the SNP group, pressure was applied to the skin without penetration. Procedures were performed once per week for 3 consecutive weeks. Clinical evaluation was performed before treatment, and on days 28, 42 and 70 after treatment. Statistically significant differences (p PNE and DDN of the LPM showed greater pain reduction efficacy and improved MIO compared to SNP. Improvement was noted earlier in the PNE group than in the DDN group.
dc.identifier.doi10.4317/medoral.22488
dc.identifier.essn1698-6946
dc.identifier.pmcPMC6051683
dc.identifier.pmid29924769
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051683/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22488
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/12624
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal
dc.journal.titleabbreviationMed Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.numbere454-e462
dc.pubmedtypeComparative Study
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.meshAcupuncture Therapy
dc.subject.meshAdolescent
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshDouble-Blind Method
dc.subject.meshElectric Stimulation Therapy
dc.subject.meshElectrolysis
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshMyofascial Pain Syndromes
dc.subject.meshNeedles
dc.subject.meshPterygoid Muscles
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.subject.meshTrigger Points
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult
dc.titleRandomized, double-blind study comparing percutaneous electrolysis and dry needling for the management of temporomandibular myofascial pain.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number23
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC6051683.pdf
Size:
493.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format