Publication:
Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.

dc.contributor.authorGuerra-Martín, María Dolores
dc.contributor.authorTejedor-Bueno, María Sandra
dc.contributor.authorCorrea-Casado, Matías
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T10:40:28Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T10:40:28Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-24
dc.description.abstractAccording to the World Health Organization, cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world. In Spain, about a quarter of a million cases were diagnosed in 2017, and 81% of the Spanish population has used, at least once, some kind of complementary therapy. Said therapies are increasingly being used by cancer patients. The purpose of the study is to analyse the effectiveness of complementary therapies among cancer patients. A systematic peer review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guide in four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and WOS). The inclusion criteria were Randomised Clinical Trials, published between 2013 and 2018, with a value of 3 or more on the Jadad Scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019127593). The study sample amounted to 1845 patients (64.55% women), the most common being breast cancer patients (794), followed by lung cancer patients (341). Fifteen complementary therapies were identified. We found two studies for each of the following: electroacupuncture, phytotherapy, hypnotherapy, guided imagery and progressive muscle relaxation. From the remaining ones, we identified a study on each therapy. The findings reveal some effective complementary therapies: auriculotherapy and acupuncture, laser moxibustion, hypnosis, Ayurveda, electroacupuncture, progressive muscle relaxation and guided imagery, yoga, phytotherapy, music therapy and traditional Chinese medicine. On the other hand, electroacupuncture, laser moxibustion and traditional Chinese medicine presented adverse effects, and kinesiology did not show effectiveness.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph18031017
dc.identifier.essn1660-4601
dc.identifier.pmcPMC7908482
dc.identifier.pmid33498883
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908482/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1017/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/17052
dc.issue.number3
dc.journal.titleInternational journal of environmental research and public health
dc.journal.titleabbreviationInt J Environ Res Public Health
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationAPES Hospital de Poniente de Almería
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.pubmedtypeSystematic Review
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectRandomised Controlled Trial
dc.subjectcomplementary therapies
dc.subjecteffectiveness
dc.subjectneoplasms
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.subject.meshAcupuncture Therapy
dc.subject.meshComplementary Therapies
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMoxibustion
dc.subject.meshNeoplasms
dc.subject.meshRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.titleEffectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number18
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC7908482.pdf
Size:
677.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format