Publication:
Cost-effectiveness of a primary care-based exercise intervention in perimenopausal women. The FLAMENCO Project.

dc.contributor.authorŠpacírová, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorEpstein, David
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Mochón, Leticia
dc.contributor.authorAparicio, Virginia A
dc.contributor.authorBorges-Cosic, Milkana
dc.contributor.authorLópez Del Amo, M Puerto
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Martín, José J
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T10:23:34Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T10:23:34Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-16
dc.description.abstractAdequate physical activity levels and a healthy lifestyle may prevent all kinds of non-communicable diseases, promote well-being and reduce health-care costs among perimenopausal women. This study assessed an exercise programme for perimenopausal women. A total of 150 women (aged 45-64 years) not engaged in regular physical activity were randomly assigned to either a 16 week exercise intervention or to the control group. The study was conducted from the perspective of the National Health System. Health outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), measured by the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. The total direct costs of the programme were the costs of visits to primary care, specialty care, emergency, medicines, instructor cost and infrastructure cost. The results were expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken to test the robustness of the analysis. Mean QALYs over 16 weeks were.228 in the control group and.230 in the intervention group (mean difference: .002; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: -0.005 to 0.009). Improvements from baseline were greater in the intervention group in all dimensions of the EuroQol-5D-5L but not statistically significant. The total costs at the end of the intervention were 160.38 € in the control group and 167.80 € in the intervention group (mean difference: 7.42 €; 95%CI: -47 to 62). The exercise programme had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 4,686 €/QALY. The programme could be considered cost-effective, although the overall difference in health benefits and costs was very modest. Longer term follow-up is needed.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.05.012
dc.identifier.essn1578-1283
dc.identifier.pmid30340794
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.05.012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/13108
dc.issue.number6
dc.journal.titleGaceta sanitaria
dc.journal.titleabbreviationGac Sanit
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationEscuela Andaluza de Salud Pública-EASP
dc.page.number529-535
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAnálisis de coste-utilidad
dc.subjectAños de vida ajustados por calidad
dc.subjectCost-benefit analysis
dc.subjectEjercicio
dc.subjectExercise
dc.subjectMenopause
dc.subjectMenopausia
dc.subjectMujeres
dc.subjectQuality-adjusted life years
dc.subjectWomen
dc.subject.meshCost-Benefit Analysis
dc.subject.meshDirect Service Costs
dc.subject.meshExercise
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshPerimenopause
dc.subject.meshProgram Evaluation
dc.subject.meshQuality-Adjusted Life Years
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and Specificity
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of a primary care-based exercise intervention in perimenopausal women. The FLAMENCO Project.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number33
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files