Publication:
How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study.

dc.contributor.authorMiceli, Alessio
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Sánchez, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorDueñas-Díez, José-Luis
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T10:43:03Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T10:43:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-23
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ring pessaries under continuous use for > 2 years. Our starting hypothesis was that their use without periodic removal, cleaning or replacement for between 24 to 48 months after insertion is safe and effective. This was a prospective observational and descriptive study. One hundred one women who successfully completed the 24 first months of continuous use of a ring pessary were included and monitored for another 24 months. The objectives were to establish the percentage of patients maintaining its use 48 months after insertion, the reasons for discontinuation and the adverse events. Another purpose of this study was to determine the timing of replacement of the vaginal pessary in long-term users. Of the women, 92.1% (93/101) had successful pessary use, and it was discontinued by three patients (2.9%, 3/101); 76.2% (77/101) of the women continued pessary use after the end of the study, and in 16 (15.8%, 16/101) patients, after pessary removal, the prolapse disappeared and did not recur. Forty-five women (48.4%, 45/93) presented some adverse events that required temporary pessary removal. The most common one was an increase in vaginal discharge (73.3%, 33/45). In four women (8.9%, 4/45), the ring pessary was detected embedded in the vaginal epithelium. Continuous use of a ring pessary can be recommended for 2 years in hysterectomized women and for 4 years in non-hysterectomized women if there are no complications.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-021-04706-0
dc.identifier.essn1433-3023
dc.identifier.pmcPMC7900800
dc.identifier.pmid33620536
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900800/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00192-021-04706-0.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/17219
dc.issue.number6
dc.journal.titleInternational urogynecology journal
dc.journal.titleabbreviationInt Urogynecol J
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
dc.page.number1471-1478
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeObservational Study
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectContinuous use
dc.subjectEmbedded pessary
dc.subjectPOP
dc.subjectRemoval
dc.subjectRing pessary
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshPelvic Organ Prolapse
dc.subject.meshPessaries
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshSeverity of Illness Index
dc.titleHow often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number32
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC7900800.pdf
Size:
300.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format