Publication:
Hepatitis C virus genotype 3: Meta-analysis on sustained virologic response rates with currently available treatment options.

dc.contributor.authorAmpuero, Javier
dc.contributor.authorReddy, K Rajender
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Gomez, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T08:33:22Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T08:33:22Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractTo address the therapeutic efficacy of various treatment regimens in genotype 3 selecting randomized clinical trials and prospective National Cohort Studies. (1) PEG-INF-based therapy including sofosbuvir (SOF) + RBV for 12 wk vs SOF + RBV 24 wk; (2) SOF + RBV therapy 12 wk/16 wk vs 24 wk; and (3) the role of RBV in SOF + daclatasvir (DCV) and SOF + ledipasvir (LDV) combinations. This meta-analysis provides robust information with the intention of addressing treatment strategy for hepatitis C virus genotype 3. A combination treatment including SOF + RBV + PEG-IFN for 12 wk notes better SVR than with only SOF + RBV for 12 wk, although its association with more frequent adverse effects may be a limiting factor. Longer duration therapy with SOF + RBV (24 wk) has achieved higher SVR rates than shorter durations (12 or 16 wk). SOF + LDV are not an ideal treatment for genotype 3. Lastly, SOF + DCV combination is probably the best oral therapy option and the addition of RBV does not appear to be needed to increase SVR rates substantially.
dc.identifier.doi10.3748/wjg.v22.i22.5285
dc.identifier.essn2219-2840
dc.identifier.pmcPMC4893476
dc.identifier.pmid27298572
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893476/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i22.5285
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/10175
dc.issue.number22
dc.journal.titleWorld journal of gastroenterology
dc.journal.titleabbreviationWorld J Gastroenterol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBIS
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number5285-92
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeMeta-Analysis
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectDaclatasvir
dc.subjectGenotype 3
dc.subjectHepatitis C
dc.subjectLedipasvir
dc.subjectSofosbuvir
dc.subject.meshAdministration, Oral
dc.subject.meshAntiviral Agents
dc.subject.meshCarbamates
dc.subject.meshDrug Resistance, Viral
dc.subject.meshDrug Therapy, Combination
dc.subject.meshGenotype
dc.subject.meshHepacivirus
dc.subject.meshHepatitis C
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshImidazoles
dc.subject.meshOdds Ratio
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshPyrrolidines
dc.subject.meshRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subject.meshRibavirin
dc.subject.meshSofosbuvir
dc.subject.meshSustained Virologic Response
dc.subject.meshTime Factors
dc.subject.meshValine
dc.titleHepatitis C virus genotype 3: Meta-analysis on sustained virologic response rates with currently available treatment options.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number22
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files