Publication:
Predictors of success of high-flow nasal cannula in the treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

dc.contributor.authorArtacho Ruiz, R
dc.contributor.authorArtacho Jurado, B
dc.contributor.authorCaballero Güeto, F
dc.contributor.authorCano Yuste, A
dc.contributor.authorDurbán García, I
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Delgado, F
dc.contributor.authorGuzmán Pérez, J A
dc.contributor.authorLópez Obispo, M
dc.contributor.authorQuero Del Río, I
dc.contributor.authorRivera Espinar, F
dc.contributor.authorDel Campo Molina, E
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T13:40:19Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T13:40:19Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-24
dc.description.abstractHigh-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is used in the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF) and is both safe and effective in reversing hypoxemia. In order to minimize mortality and clinical complications associated to this practice, a series of tools must be developed to allow early detection of failure. The present study was carried out to: (i)examine the impact of respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), ROX index (ROXI=[SpO2/FiO2]/RR) and oxygen inspired fraction (FiO2) on the success of HFNC in patients with hypoxemic ARF; and (ii)analyze the length of stay and mortality in the ICU, and the need for mechanical ventilation (MV). A retrospective study was carried out in the medical-surgical ICU of Hospital de Montilla (Córdoba, Spain). Patients diagnosed with hypoxemic ARF and treated with HFNC from January 2016 to January 2018 were included. Out of 27 patients diagnosed with ARF, 19 (70.37%) had hypoxemic ARF. Fifteen of them (78.95%) responded satisfactorily to HFNC, while four (21.05%) failed. After two hours of treatment, RR proved to be the best predictor of success (area under the ROC curve [AUROC] 0.858; 95%CI: 0.63-1.05; P=.035). For this parameter, the optimal cutoff point was 29rpm (sensitivity 75%, specificity 87%). After 8hours of treatment, FiO2 and ROXI were reliable predictors of success (FiO2: AUROC 0.95; 95%CI: 0.85-1.04; P=.007 and ROXI: AUROC 0.967; 95%CI: 0.886-1.047; P=.005). In the case of FiO2 the optimal cutoff point was 0.59 (sensitivity 75%, specificity 93%), while the best cutoff point for ROXI was 5.98 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 75%). Using a Cox regression model, we found RR5.98 after 8hours of treatment, to be associated with a lesser risk of MV (RR: HR 0.103; 95%CI: 0.11-0.99; P=.05; FiO2: HR 0.053; 95%CI: 0.005-0.52; P=.012; and ROXI: HR 0.077; 95%CI: 0.008-0.755; P=.028, respectively). RR after two hours of treatment, and FiO2 and ROXI after 8hours of treatment, were the best predictors of success of HFNC. RR5.98 were associated with a lesser risk of MV.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.medin.2019.07.012
dc.identifier.essn2173-5727
dc.identifier.pmid31455561
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2019.07.012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/14452
dc.issue.number2
dc.journal.titleMedicina intensiva
dc.journal.titleabbreviationMed Intensiva (Engl Ed)
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.isoes
dc.organizationAPES Alto Guadalquivir
dc.page.number80-87
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAcute respiratory failure
dc.subjectCánula nasal de alto flujo
dc.subjectFallo respiratorio agudo
dc.subjectHigh-flow nasal cannula
dc.subjectHipoxemia
dc.subjectHypoxemia
dc.subjectPredictores de éxito
dc.subjectPredictors of success
dc.subjectROX index
dc.subjectÍndice ROX
dc.titlePredictors of success of high-flow nasal cannula in the treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
dc.title.alternativePredictores de éxito del tratamiento con cánula nasal de alto flujo en el fallo respiratorio agudo hipoxémico.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number45
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files