Publication:
Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations.

dc.contributor.authorO'Gorman, N
dc.contributor.authorWright, D
dc.contributor.authorPoon, L C
dc.contributor.authorRolnik, D L
dc.contributor.authorSyngelaki, A
dc.contributor.authorde Alvarado, M
dc.contributor.authorCarbone, I F
dc.contributor.authorDutemeyer, V
dc.contributor.authorFiolna, M
dc.contributor.authorFrick, A
dc.contributor.authorKaragiotis, N
dc.contributor.authorMastrodima, S
dc.contributor.authorde Paco Matallana, C
dc.contributor.authorPapaioannou, G
dc.contributor.authorPazos, A
dc.contributor.authorPlasencia, W
dc.contributor.authorNicolaides, K H
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T09:44:03Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T09:44:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractTo compare the performance of screening for pre-eclampsia (PE) based on risk factors from medical history, as recommended by NICE and ACOG, with the method proposed by The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), which uses Bayes' theorem to combine the a-priori risk from maternal factors, derived by a multivariable logistic model, with the results of various combinations of biophysical and biochemical measurements. This was a prospective multicenter study of screening for PE in 8775 singleton pregnancies at 11-13 weeks' gestation. A previously published FMF algorithm was used for the calculation of patient-specific risk of PE in each individual. The detection rates (DRs) and false-positive rates (FPRs) for delivery with PE In the study population, 239 (2.7%) cases developed PE, of which 17 (0.2%), 59 (0.7%) and 180 (2.1%) developed PE Performance of screening for PE at 11-13 weeks' gestation by the FMF algorithm using a combination of maternal factors, MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF, is by far superior to the methods recommended by NICE and ACOG. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/uog.17455
dc.identifier.essn1469-0705
dc.identifier.pmid28295782
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/uog.17455
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/10965
dc.issue.number6
dc.journal.titleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.journal.titleabbreviationUltrasound Obstet Gynecol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario San Cecilio
dc.page.number756-760
dc.pubmedtypeComparative Study
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeMulticenter Study
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectBayes' theorem
dc.subjectfirst-trimester screening
dc.subjectmean arterial pressure
dc.subjectplacental growth factor
dc.subjectpre-eclampsia
dc.subjectpregnancy-associated plasma protein-A
dc.subjectpyramid of pregnancy care
dc.subjectsurvival model
dc.subjectuterine artery Doppler
dc.subject.meshBiomarkers
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshGestational Age
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshPractice Guidelines as Topic
dc.subject.meshPre-Eclampsia
dc.subject.meshPregnancy
dc.subject.meshPregnancy Trimester, First
dc.subject.meshPrenatal Diagnosis
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshROC Curve
dc.subject.meshRisk Assessment
dc.subject.meshSocieties, Medical
dc.subject.meshUnited Kingdom
dc.subject.meshUnited States
dc.titleMulticenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number49
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files