Publication:
Economic evaluation of the treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) from the national payer perspective: introduction of a new treatment to the patient journey. A simulation of three European countries.

dc.contributor.authorMarcellusi, A
dc.contributor.authorViti, R
dc.contributor.authorSciattella, P
dc.contributor.authorSarmati, L
dc.contributor.authorStreinu-Cercel, A
dc.contributor.authorPana, A
dc.contributor.authorEspin, J
dc.contributor.authorHorcajada, J P
dc.contributor.authorFavato, G
dc.contributor.authorAndretta, D
dc.contributor.authorSoro, M
dc.contributor.authorAndreoni, M
dc.contributor.authorMennini, F S
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T10:29:49Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T10:29:49Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-04
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to develop a spending predictor model to evaluate the direct costs associated with the management of ABSSSIs from the National health-care provider's perspective of Italy, Romania, and Spain. Methodology: A decision-analytic model was developed to evaluate the diagnostic and clinical pathways of hospitalized ABSSSI patients based on scientific guidelines and real-world data. A Standard of Care (SoC) scenario was compared with a dalbavancin scenario in which the patients could be discharged early. The epidemiological and cost parameters were extrapolated from national administrative databases (i.e., hospital information system). A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and one-way sensitivity analysis (OWA) were performed. Results: Overall, the model estimated an average annual number of patients with ABSSSIs of approximately 50,000 in Italy, Spain, and Romania. On average, the introduction of dalbavancin reduced the length of stay by 3.3 days per ABSSSI patient. From an economic perspective, dalbavancin did not incur any additional cost from the National Healthcare perspective, and the results were consistent among the countries. The PSA and OWA demonstrated the robustness of these results. Conclusion: This model represents a useful tool for policymakers by providing information regarding the economic and organizational consequences of an early discharge approach in ABSSSI management.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14737167.2019.1569516
dc.identifier.essn1744-8379
dc.identifier.pmid30714834
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/id/eprint/42734/1/Marcellusi-A-42734-AAM.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/13504
dc.issue.number5
dc.journal.titleExpert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research
dc.journal.titleabbreviationExpert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationEscuela Andaluza de Salud Pública-EASP
dc.page.number581-599
dc.pubmedtypeComparative Study
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectABSSSIs
dc.subjectItaly
dc.subjectRomania
dc.subjectSpain
dc.subjectdalbavancin
dc.subjecteconomic evaluation
dc.subject.meshAcute Disease
dc.subject.meshAnti-Bacterial Agents
dc.subject.meshComputer Simulation
dc.subject.meshCost-Benefit Analysis
dc.subject.meshDecision Support Techniques
dc.subject.meshHospitalization
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshItaly
dc.subject.meshLength of Stay
dc.subject.meshModels, Economic
dc.subject.meshRomania
dc.subject.meshSkin Diseases, Bacterial
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.subject.meshTeicoplanin
dc.titleEconomic evaluation of the treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) from the national payer perspective: introduction of a new treatment to the patient journey. A simulation of three European countries.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dc.volume.number19
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files