Publication:
Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review.

dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Sánchez, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGómez García, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Medina, Isabel María
dc.contributor.authorCuesta-Vargas, Antonio I
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T13:32:30Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T13:32:30Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-03
dc.description.abstractThe prevention and relief of suffering are regarded as a goal at the end of life; therefore, suffering assessment at the end of life is essential. In this regard, we need instruments that allow us to evaluate this construct for gathering more evidence, as the assessment of suffering is increasingly used in research and the clinical setting. Many measures have been designed to assess this construct, and the selection of the most appropriate instrument is crucial. The aims of this systematic review are to (1) identify the measures assessing suffering in patients with advanced disease and their psychometric properties and (2) evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties. The protocol of this systematic review was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Guidelines. A systematic psychometric review of measures assessing suffering in patients with advanced disease and their psychometric properties will be carried out according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). The search strategy will be performed following the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. Searches will be conducted in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, SciELO, Open Grey, Scopus, Web of Science and COSMIN database of systematic reviews, and it will be limited by time (1980-2018) and language (only literature in English and Spanish). Literature will be evaluated by two independent reviewers according to the COSMIN checklist, and measurement properties data of each study that meet the inclusion criteria will be scored independently by two researchers according to COSMIN quality ratings. Ethical approval is not necessary for systematic review protocols. The results will be disseminated by publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. CRD42018106488.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027524
dc.identifier.essn2044-6055
dc.identifier.pmcPMC6500222
dc.identifier.pmid30948616
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500222/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/9/4/e027524.full.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/13791
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleBMJ open
dc.journal.titleabbreviationBMJ Open
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA
dc.page.numbere027524
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectpalliative care
dc.subjectsuffering
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subject.meshConsensus
dc.subject.meshHealth Status
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshPalliative Care
dc.subject.meshPsychometrics
dc.subject.meshQuality of Life
dc.subject.meshResearch Design
dc.subject.meshSystematic Reviews as Topic
dc.subject.meshTerminal Care
dc.titleSuffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number9
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC6500222.pdf
Size:
228.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format