Publication:
Hypersensitivity Reactions to Multiple Iodinated Contrast Media.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2020-09-23

Authors

Doña, Inmaculada
Bogas, Gador
Salas, Maria
Testera, Almudena
Moreno, Esther
Laguna, Jose Julio
Torres, Maria Jose

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Frontiers Research Foundation
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to iodinated contrast media (ICM) has risen over last years, representing an important health problem. HSRs to ICMs are classified into immediate reactions (IRs) and non-immediate reactions (NIRs) according to if they occur within 1 h or longer after ICM administration. The diagnosis of HSRs to ICM is complex as skin test (ST) sensitivity ranges widely, and drug provocation test (DPT) protocols are heterogeneous. In this manuscript, we describe the clinical characteristics of a series of patients confirmed as HSR to ICM and the diagnosis procedure carried out, looking into those cases confirmed as HSRs to multiple ICMs. For this purpose, we prospectively evaluated patients suggestive of HSRs to ICMs and classified them as IRs or NIRs. STs were carried out using a wide panel of ICMs, and in those with a negative ST, a single-blind placebo controlled DPT was performed with the culprit. If ST or DPT were positive, then tolerance was assessed with an alternative negative ST ICM. We included 101 cases (12 IRs and 89 NIRs) confirmed as allergic. Among them, 36 (35.64%) cases were allergic to more than one ICM (8 IRs and 28 NIRs). The most common ICM involved were iomeprol and iodixanol. Although not statistically significant, the percentage of patients reporting anaphylaxis was higher in patients allergic to multiple ICMs compared with patients allergic to a single ICM (50 vs. 25%). Likewise, the percentage of positive results in STs was higher in patients allergic to multiple ICMs compared with those allergic to a single ICM (for IR 62.5 vs. 25%, p > 0.05; and for NIR, 85.71 vs. 24.59%, p 0.05; and for NIR, 85.71 vs. 24.59%, pp < 0.000). In cases allergic to more than one ICM, DPT with negative-ST ICM was positive in more than 60% (24/36) of cases. Therefore, allergy to multiple ICMs is common, associated to severe reactions in IRs, and confirmed frequently by positive STs. The allergological workup should include DPT not only to establish the diagnosis but also to identify safe alternative ICM, even if ICM is structurally unrelated and ST is negative. More studies are needed to clarify mechanisms underlying cross-reactivity among ICMs.

Description

MeSH Terms

Anaphylaxis
Contrast Media
Single-Blind Method
Skin Tests

DeCS Terms

Hipersensibilidad
Guías como Asunto
Anafilaxia
Medios de Contraste
Pruebas Cutáneas

CIE Terms

Keywords

Anaphylaxis, Drug allergy, Drug provocation test, Exanthema, Hypersensitivity, Iodinated contrast media, Skin test, Urticaria

Citation

Doña I, Bogas G, Salas M, Testera A, Moreno E, Laguna JJ, et al. Hypersensitivity Reactions to Multiple Iodinated Contrast Media. Front Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 23;11:575437