Publication:
Choice of New Oral Anticoagulant Agents Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation: FANTASIIA Study.

dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Arribas, José
dc.contributor.authorBertomeu-González, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorAnguita-Sanchez, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCequier, Ángel
dc.contributor.authorMuñiz, Javier
dc.contributor.authorCastillo, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorSanchis, Juan
dc.contributor.authorRoldán, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorMarín, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorBertomeu-Martínez, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorinvestigators of the FANTASIIA study
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T08:32:03Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T08:32:03Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-30
dc.description.abstractAtrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Many patients with AF receive chronic anticoagulation, either with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or with non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We sought to analyze variables associated with prescription of NOAC. Patients with AF under anticoagulation treatment were prospectively recruited in this observational registry. The sample comprised 1290 patients under chronic anticoagulation for AF, 994 received VKA (77.1%) and 296 NOAC (22.9%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with use of NOAC. Mean age was 73.8 ± 9.4 years, and 42.5% of the patients were women. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was 0 in 4.9% of the population, 1 in 24.1%, and ≥2 in 71% (median = 4, interquartile range = 2). Variables associated with NOAC treatment were major bleeding (odds ratio [OR] = 3.36; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.73-6.51; P Medical and social variables were associated with prescription of NOAC. Major bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, university education, and higher glomerular filtration rate were more frequent among patients under NOAC. On the contrary, patients with history of cancer or bradyarrhythmias more frequently received VKA.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1074248415596426
dc.identifier.essn1940-4034
dc.identifier.pmid26229096
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://ruc.udc.es/dspace/bitstream/2183/16349/2/MorenoArribas_ChoiceNew.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/10027
dc.issue.number2
dc.journal.titleJournal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics
dc.journal.titleabbreviationJ Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Reina Sofía
dc.page.number150-6
dc.pubmedtypeComparative Study
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeMulticenter Study
dc.pubmedtypeObservational Study
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectanticoagulant treatment
dc.subjectatrial fibrillation
dc.subjectnonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants
dc.subjectvitamin K antagonists
dc.subject.meshAdministration, Oral
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over
dc.subject.meshAnticoagulants
dc.subject.meshAtrial Fibrillation
dc.subject.meshClinical Decision-Making
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshFibrinolytic Agents
dc.subject.meshHemorrhage
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshVitamin K
dc.titleChoice of New Oral Anticoagulant Agents Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation: FANTASIIA Study.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionSMUR
dc.volume.number21
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files