Publication:
Impact of CPAP therapy on health-related quality of life in elderly patients with apnoea-hypopnea syndrome: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2016-10-04

Authors

Serrano-Merino, Jesus
Perula-de-Torres, Luis A.
Munoz-Gomez, Rafaela
Roldan-Villalobos, Ana
Feu-Collado, M. Nuria
Ruiz-Moral, Roger
Jurado-Gamez, Bernabe

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

European Respiratory Society
Metrics
Google Scholar
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a chronic pathology characterised by the presence of repetitive upper airway obstruction during the sleep, the prevalence of which increases with the age [1], and for which continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of choice [2–4]. However, there have been few studies on diagnosis and management of OSA in elderly people. A qualitative systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the impact of CPAP therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in OSA patients (aged >65 years), diagnosed by polysomnography or polygraphy and treated with CPAP for at least 3 months (>4 h·day−1 ). Studies whose primary outcome did not assess HRQL were excluded. Interventions were categorised according to whether or not they included CPAP treatment. The primary outcome was HRQL based on validated generic or specific questionnaires.

Description

MeSH Terms

Polysomnography
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Quality of Life
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

DeCS Terms

Apnea del sueño obstructiva
Presión positiva continua en las vías respiratorias
Calidad de vida
Polisomnografía

CIE Terms

Keywords

Positive airway pressure, Obstructive sleep-apnea

Citation

Serrano Merino J, Pérula de Torres LA, Muñoz Gómez R, Roldán Villalobos A, Feu Collado MN, Ruiz-Moral R, et al. mpact of CPAP therapy on health-related quality of life in elderly patients with apnoea-hypopnea syndrome: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Eur Respir J. 2017 Jan 18;49(1):1601644