Publication:
Comparing an e-Health program vs home rehabilitation program in patients with non-specific low back pain: A study protocol randomized feasibility trial.

dc.contributor.authorCastro-Sánchez, Adelaida María
dc.contributor.authorAntequera-Soler, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorMatarán-Peñarrocha, Guillermo Adolfo
dc.contributor.authorHurley, Deirdre A
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-de la Cal, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-López, Héctor
dc.contributor.authorCapel-Alcaraz, Ana María
dc.contributor.authorLara-Palomo, Inmaculada Carmen
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-03T13:38:37Z
dc.date.available2023-05-03T13:38:37Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThere is little evidence on the reliability of the web application-based rehabilitation systems to treat chronic low back pain (CLBP). This protocol describes a double-blind, randomized controlled feasibility trial of an e-Health intervention developed to support the self-management of people with CLBP in primary care physiotherapy. Three Hospitals with primary care for outpatients will be the units of randomisation, in each Hospital the participants will be randomized to one of two groups, a pragmatic control group receiving either the usual home program based on electrostimulation and McKenzie Therapy and e-Health intervention. Patients are followed up at 2 and 6 months. The primary outcomes are (1) acceptability and demand of the intervention by GPs, physiotherapists and patients and (2) feasibility and optimal study design/methods for a definitive trial. Secondary outcomes will include analysis in the clinical outcomes of pain, disability, fear of movement, quality of life, isometric resistance of the trunk flexors, lumbar anteflexion and lumbar segmental range of motion. The specific e-Health programs to home could increase adherence to treatment, prevent stages of greater pain and disability, and improve the painful symptomatology. The e-Health programs could be an effective healthcare tool that can reach a large number of people living in rural or remote areas.
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-210040
dc.identifier.essn1878-6324
dc.identifier.pmid34308900
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://content.iospress.com:443/download/journal-of-back-and-musculoskeletal-rehabilitation/bmr210040?id=journal-of-back-and-musculoskeletal-rehabilitation%2Fbmr210040
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/20511
dc.issue.number2
dc.journal.titleJournal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation
dc.journal.titleabbreviationJ Back Musculoskelet Rehabil
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationServicio Andaluz de Salud-SAS
dc.page.number239-252
dc.pubmedtypeClinical Trial Protocol
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectLow back pain
dc.subjectchronic disease
dc.subjecte-Health
dc.subjecthome exercise
dc.subjectrandomised controlled trial
dc.subject.meshFeasibility Studies
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshLow Back Pain
dc.subject.meshQuality of Life
dc.subject.meshRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Results
dc.subject.meshTelemedicine
dc.titleComparing an e-Health program vs home rehabilitation program in patients with non-specific low back pain: A study protocol randomized feasibility trial.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number35
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files