Publication:
Malmström vacuum or Kielland forceps: which causes more damage to pelvic floor?

dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Mejido, J A
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Martínez, A
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Diaz, E
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Fernández, C
dc.contributor.authorOrtega, I
dc.contributor.authorMedina, M
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Corona, A
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Palacín, A
dc.contributor.authorSainz, J A
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T13:37:18Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T13:37:18Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractTo determine whether differences exist in the rate of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion between women who had undergone either Malmström vacuum delivery (MVD) or Kielland forceps delivery (KFD), allowing for potential confounding factors. This was a prospective observational study of nulliparous women undergoing instrumental delivery using Malmström vacuum extractor or Kielland forceps, at two hospital centers in Spain. Fetal head position (anterior, posterior or transverse) and fetal head station (low or mid) were assessed by ultrasound and digital examination, respectively. Avulsion was defined on tomographic ultrasound imaging as an abnormal insertion of the LAM in the three central slices from the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions. In total, 414 patients were included in the study (212 MVD and 202 KFD). We observed a higher rate of LAM avulsion in the KFD group (KFD 49.5% vs MVD 32.5%; P = 0.001). When the results were evaluated according to fetal head position and station, we observed no differences in LAM avulsion. The crude odds ratio (OR) for the difference in avulsion between women in the KFD and MVD groups was 2.03 (95% CI, 1.36-3.03). However, when adjusted for duration of second stage of labor, fetal head circumference and fetal head station, the OR was no longer statistically significant (OR, 2.14 (95% CI, 0.95-4.85); P = 0.068). When potential confounding factors are taken into account, the rate of LAM avulsion does not differ between women according to whether they have undergone KFD or MVD. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/uog.20404
dc.identifier.essn1469-0705
dc.identifier.pmid31332857
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/uog.20404
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/14282
dc.issue.number2
dc.journal.titleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.journal.titleabbreviationUltrasound Obstet Gynecol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationÁrea de Gestión Sanitaria Sur de Sevilla
dc.organizationAGS - Sur de Sevilla
dc.page.number257-263
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeMulticenter Study
dc.pubmedtypeObservational Study
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject3D transperineal ultrasound
dc.subjectforceps delivery
dc.subjectlevator ani muscle
dc.subjectvacuum delivery
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshFetus
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshLabor Presentation
dc.subject.meshObstetric Labor Complications
dc.subject.meshObstetrical Forceps
dc.subject.meshOdds Ratio
dc.subject.meshPelvic Floor
dc.subject.meshPregnancy
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.subject.meshUltrasonography, Prenatal
dc.subject.meshVacuum Extraction, Obstetrical
dc.titleMalmström vacuum or Kielland forceps: which causes more damage to pelvic floor?
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number55
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files