Publication: Molecular Biomarkers for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
No Thumbnail Available
Identifiers
Date
2022-11-10
Authors
Del Pino-Sedeno, Tasmania
Infante-Ventura, Diego
Castellano, Aythami de Armas
De Pablos-Rodriguez, Pedro
Rueda-Dominguez, Antonio
Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro
Trujillo-Martin, Maria M.
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Abstract
Context: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common type of cancer in men. Individualized risk stratification is crucial to adjust decision-making. A variety of molecular biomarkers have been developed in order to identify patients at risk of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) defined by the most common PCa risk stratifica-tion systems. Objective: The present study aims to examine the effectiveness (diagnostic accu-racy) of blood or urine-based PCa biomarkers to identify patients at high risk of csPCa. Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Medline and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2021. Randomized or nonran-domized clinical trials, and cohort and case-control studies were eligible for inclu-sion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were obtained. Evidence synthesis: Sixty-five studies (N = 34 287) were included. Not all studies included prostate-specific antigen-selected patients. The pooled data showed that the Prostate Health Index (PHI), with any cutoff point between 15 and 30, had sen-sitivity of 0.95-1.00 and specificity of 0.14-0.33 for csPCa detection. The pooled estimates for SelectMDx test sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 and 0.49, respectively. Conclusions: The PHI test has a high diagnostic accuracy rate for csPCa detection, and its incorporation in the diagnostic process could reduce unnecessary biopsies.
Description
MeSH Terms
DeCS Terms
CIE Terms
Keywords
Prostatic neoplasms, Molecular markers, Clinically significant cancer, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Health index phi, Digital rectal examination, Diagnostic-accuracy, Total psa, Urinary pca3, Pca3-based nomograms, Antigen isoform, 2-10 ng/ml, Biopsy, Performance