Publication:
Color compatibility between dental structures and three different types of ceramic systems.

dc.contributor.authorPop-Ciutrila, Ioana-Sofia
dc.contributor.authorGhinea, Razvan
dc.contributor.authorColosi, Horatiu A
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-López, Javier
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Maria M
dc.contributor.authorParavina, Rade D
dc.contributor.authorDudea, Diana
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T10:42:36Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T10:42:36Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-17
dc.description.abstractTo assess color compatibility between dental structures (human enamel and dentine) and three different types of ceramic systems. Samples (1 and 2 mm-thick) of extracted tooth (containing dentine and enamel areas) and three ceramic systems with different shades and opacities (HT-High Translucent, T-Translucent) were prepared for this study: Vita Suprinity-VS (HT, T; A1, A2, A3, A3.5, B2, C2, D2) (Vita Zahnfabrik); Vita Enamic-VE (HT, T; 1M1, 1M2, 2M2, 3M2) (Vita Zahnfabrik) and Noritake Super Porcelain EX-3-NKT (A1, A2, A3, A3.5, B2, C2, D2) (Kuraray Noritake Dental). Reflectance measurements of all samples were performed over black backgrounds using a non-contact spectroradiometer (SpectraScan PR-670, Photo Research) under a CIE 45°/0° geometry. CIE L*a*b* color parameters were measured and CIELAB/CIEDE2000 color differences (ΔE00/ΔE*ab) and corresponding Coverage Error (CE) of ceramic system for dentine or enamel samples were calculated. Color data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc multiple comparisons tests. CE values were interpreted by comparisons with available 50:50% acceptability color threshold (AT) for dentistry. Statistically significant differences in lightness were found among all ceramic systems and human dentine (p  0.05) with VEHT. Thin samples (1 mm) of dentine and enamel showed significant statistical differences (p  Color coordinates of evaluated esthetic ceramic systems were statistically different from those of human dentine in almost all cases. The evaluated ZrO2 lithium silicate glass-ceramic (VS), with its two levels of translucency, provided lower CE values with human enamel samples while conventional feldspathic ceramic (NKT) and hybrid ceramic systems (VE) demonstrated a better color compatibility with dentin samples.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-021-01404-7
dc.identifier.essn1472-6831
dc.identifier.pmcPMC7890892
dc.identifier.pmid33596918
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890892/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01404-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/17193
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleBMC oral health
dc.journal.titleabbreviationBMC Oral Health
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationIBS
dc.page.number75
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectColor coordinates
dc.subjectCoverage error
dc.subjectDental ceramics
dc.subjectDentine
dc.subjectEnamel
dc.subjectSpectroradiometer
dc.subject.meshCeramics
dc.subject.meshColor
dc.subject.meshDental Porcelain
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testing
dc.titleColor compatibility between dental structures and three different types of ceramic systems.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number21
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC7890892.pdf
Size:
1.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format