Publication:
In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against isolates of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens from a range of infection sources: SIDERO‑WT‑2014-2018 studies in Spain.

dc.contributor.authorCercenado, Emilia
dc.contributor.authorCardenoso, Laura
dc.contributor.authorPenin, Rocio
dc.contributor.authorLongshaw, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorHenriksen, Anne Santerre
dc.contributor.authorPascual, Alvaro
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T11:43:37Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T11:43:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-15
dc.description.abstractThe incidence of antimicrobial resistance in Europe is rising. Cefiderocol is approved in Europe for treatment of aerobic Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections in adults with limited treatment options. We report the in vitro activity of cefiderocol versus comparators against GNB clinical isolates from Spain. MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to International Organization for Standardization guidelines. Cefiderocol was tested using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. Susceptibility rates were based on EUCAST breakpoints; if a species-specific breakpoint was unavailable, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints were used. Of 2303 isolates [1502 (65.2%) Enterobacterales and 801 (34.8%) non-fermenters], 2260 (98.1%) were susceptible to cefiderocol compared with 80.8-86.9% for comparators. By infection source, susceptibility to cefiderocol ranged from 97.3% (721/741) in isolates from patients with nosocomial pneumonia to 98.9% (349/353) in bloodstream infection isolates and was greater than susceptibility to comparators (70.7-93.6% across infection sources). Overall, 368/2303 isolates (16.0%) were meropenem-resistant. A high proportion of meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [169/175 (96.6%)] and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [48/50 (96.0%)] were cefiderocol-susceptible, similar to colistin [169/175 (96.6%) and 47/50 (94.0%), respectively] but higher than ceftazidime/avibactam [26/175 (14.9%) and 20/50 (40.0%), respectively] and ceftolozane/tazobactam [17/175 (9.7%) and 25/50 (50.0%), respectively]. All meropenem-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates [120/120 (100%)] were cefiderocol-susceptible, including one trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant isolate, with fewer susceptible to colistin [86/120 (71.7%)], ceftazidime/avibactam [42/120 (35.0%)] and ceftolozane/tazobactam [35/120 (29.2%)]. A high proportion of clinical isolates from Spain, representing a wide range of pathogens across multiple infection sources, were susceptible to cefiderocol. Cefiderocol retained activity against meropenem-resistant isolates.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jgar.2021.06.011
dc.identifier.essn2213-7173
dc.identifier.pmid34274538
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.06.011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/18215
dc.journal.titleJournal of global antimicrobial resistance
dc.journal.titleabbreviationJ Glob Antimicrob Resist
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBIS
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
dc.page.number292-300
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAntimicrobial resistance
dc.subjectCarbapenem resistance
dc.subjectCefiderocol
dc.subjectGram-negative bacteria
dc.subject.meshAnti-Bacterial Agents
dc.subject.meshCephalosporins
dc.subject.meshGram-Negative Bacteria
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMicrobial Sensitivity Tests
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.titleIn vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against isolates of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens from a range of infection sources: SIDERO‑WT‑2014-2018 studies in Spain.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number26
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files