Publication:
Role of urine immunofixation in the complete response assessment of MM patients other than light-chain-only disease.

dc.contributor.authorLahuerta, Juan-José
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Ubieto, Ana
dc.contributor.authorPaiva, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-López, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Medina, José
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Anglada, Lucía
dc.contributor.authorCedena, María-Teresa
dc.contributor.authorPuig, Noemi
dc.contributor.authorOriol, Albert
dc.contributor.authorBlanchard, María-Jesús
dc.contributor.authorRíos, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorMartínez, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorSureda, Anna
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Miguel Teodoro
dc.contributor.authorde la Rubia, Javier
dc.contributor.authorKrsnik, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorCabañas, Valentín
dc.contributor.authorPalomera, Luis
dc.contributor.authorBargay, Joan
dc.contributor.authorMateos, María-Victoria
dc.contributor.authorRosiñol, Laura
dc.contributor.authorSan Miguel, Jesús F
dc.contributor.authorBlade, Joan
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T13:32:52Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T13:32:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-22
dc.description.abstractResponse criteria for multiple myeloma (MM) require monoclonal protein (M-protein)-negative status on both serum immunofixation electrophoresis (sIFE) and urine (uIFE) immunofixation electrophoresis for classification of complete response (CR). However, uIFE is not always performed for sIFE-negative patients. We analyzed M-protein evaluations from 384 MM patients (excluding those with light-chain-only disease) treated in the GEM2012MENOS65 (NCT01916252) trial to determine the uIFE-positive rate in patients who became sIFE-negative posttreatment and evaluate rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients achieving CR, CR but without uIFE available (uncertain CR; uCR), or very good partial response (VGPR). Among 107 patients with M-protein exclusively in serum at diagnosis who became sIFE-negative posttreatment and who had uIFE available, the uIFE-positive rate was 0%. Among 161 patients with M-protein in both serum and urine at diagnosis who became sIFE-negative posttreatment, 3 (1.8%) were uIFE positive. Among patients achieving CR vs uCR, there were no significant differences in postconsolidation MRD-negative (
dc.identifier.doi10.1182/blood.2019000671
dc.identifier.essn1528-0020
dc.identifier.pmid31010846
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://ashpublications.org/blood/article-pdf/133/25/2664/1557496/bloodbld2019000671.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/13863
dc.issue.number25
dc.journal.titleBlood
dc.journal.titleabbreviationBlood
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
dc.page.number2664-2668
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subject.meshElectrophoresis
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshMultiple Myeloma
dc.subject.meshMyeloma Proteins
dc.subject.meshRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleRole of urine immunofixation in the complete response assessment of MM patients other than light-chain-only disease.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number133
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files