Publication:
Retest reliability of individual alpha ERD topography assessed by human electroencephalography.

dc.contributor.authorVázquez-Marrufo, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGalvao-Carmona, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorBenítez Lugo, María Luisa
dc.contributor.authorRuíz-Peña, Juan Luis
dc.contributor.authorBorges Guerra, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo Ayuso, Guillermo
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T10:01:12Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T10:01:12Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-31
dc.description.abstractDespite the immense literature related to diverse human electroencephalographic (EEG) parameters, very few studies have focused on the reliability of these measures. Some of the most studied components (i.e., P3 or MMN) have received more attention regarding the stability of their main parameters, such as latency, amplitude or topography. However, spectral modulations have not been as extensively evaluated considering that different analysis methods are available. The main aim of the present study is to assess the reliability of the latency, amplitude and topography of event-related desynchronization (ERD) for the alpha band (10-14 Hz) observed in a cognitive task (visual oddball). Topography reliability was analysed at different levels (for the group, within-subjects individually and between-subjects individually). The latency for alpha ERD showed stable behaviour between two sessions, and the amplitude exhibited an increment (more negative) in the second session. Alpha ERD topography exhibited a high correlation score between sessions at the group level (r = 0.903, p ERD was mainly stable between the two sessions with the exception of amplitude, which exhibited an increment in the second session. Topography exhibits excellent reliability at the group level; however, it exhibits highly heterogeneous behaviour at the individual level. Considering that the P3 was previously evaluated for this group of subjects, a direct comparison of the correlation scores was possible, and it showed that the ERD component is less reliable in individual topography than in the ERP component (P3).
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0187244
dc.identifier.essn1932-6203
dc.identifier.pmcPMC5663441
dc.identifier.pmid29088307
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663441/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187244&type=printable
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/11754
dc.issue.number10
dc.journal.titlePloS one
dc.journal.titleabbreviationPLoS One
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
dc.page.numbere0187244
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAlpha Rhythm
dc.subject.meshBrain
dc.subject.meshCognition
dc.subject.meshElectroencephalography
dc.subject.meshElectroencephalography Phase Synchronization
dc.subject.meshEvoked Potentials
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Results
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult
dc.titleRetest reliability of individual alpha ERD topography assessed by human electroencephalography.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number12
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC5663441.pdf
Size:
3.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format