Publication:
New approach for estimating risk of miscarriage after chorionic villus sampling.

dc.contributor.authorGil, M M
dc.contributor.authorMolina, F S
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Fernández, M
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, J L
dc.contributor.authorCarrillo, M P
dc.contributor.authorJani, J
dc.contributor.authorPlasencia, W
dc.contributor.authorStratieva, V
dc.contributor.authorMaiz, N
dc.contributor.authorCarretero, P
dc.contributor.authorLismonde, A
dc.contributor.authorChaveeva, P
dc.contributor.authorBurgos, J
dc.contributor.authorSantacruz, B
dc.contributor.authorZamora, J
dc.contributor.authorDe Paco Matallana, C
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T14:45:38Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T14:45:38Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-22
dc.description.abstractTo estimate the risk of miscarriage associated with chorionic villus sampling (CVS). This was a retrospective cohort study of women attending for routine ultrasound examination at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation at one of eight fetal-medicine units in Spain, Belgium and Bulgaria, between July 2007 and June 2018. Two populations were included: (1) all singleton pregnancies undergoing first-trimester assessment at Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca in Murcia, Spain, that did not have CVS (non-CVS group); and (2) all singleton pregnancies that underwent CVS following first-trimester assessment at one of the eight participating centers (CVS group). We excluded pregnancies diagnosed with genetic anomalies or major fetal defects before or after birth, those that resulted in termination and those that underwent amniocentesis later in pregnancy. We used propensity score (PS) matching analysis to estimate the association between CVS and miscarriage. We compared the risk of miscarriage of the CVS and non-CVS groups after PS matching (1:1 ratio). This procedure creates two comparable groups balancing the maternal and pregnancy characteristics that are associated with CVS, in a similar way to that in which randomization operates in a randomized clinical trial. The study population consisted of 22 250 pregnancies in the non-CVS group and 3613 in the CVS group. The incidence of miscarriage in the CVS group (2.1%; 77/3613) was significantly higher than that in the non-CVS group (0.9% (207/22 250); P  The risk of miscarriage in women undergoing CVS is about 1% higher than that in women who do not have CVS, although this excess risk is not solely attributed to the invasive procedure but, to some extent, to the demographic and pregnancy characteristics of the patients. After accounting for these risk factors and confining the analysis to low-risk pregnancies, CVS seems to increase the risk of miscarriage by about three times above the patient's background risk. Although this is a substantial increase in relative terms, in pregnancies without risk factors for miscarriage, the risk of miscarriage after CVS remains low and similar to, or slightly higher than, that in the general population. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.description.versionSi
dc.identifier.citationGil MM, Molina FS, Rodríguez-Fernández M, Delgado JL, Carrillo MP, Jani J, et al. New approach for estimating risk of miscarriage after chorionic villus sampling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;56(5):656-663.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/uog.22041
dc.identifier.essn1469-0705
dc.identifier.pmcPMC7984173
dc.identifier.pmid32281125
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7984173/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/uog.22041
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/15361
dc.issue.number5
dc.journal.titleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.journal.titleabbreviationUltrasound Obstet Gynecol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario San Cecilio
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.organizationInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA)
dc.page.number656-663
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeMulticenter Study
dc.pubmedtypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/uog.22041
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectadverse pregnancy outcome
dc.subjectchorionic villus sampling
dc.subjectfirst-trimester screening
dc.subjectinvasive procedures
dc.subjectinvasive testing
dc.subjectmiscarriage
dc.subjectpregnancy complications
dc.subjectprenatal diagnosis
dc.subject.decsAborto espontáneo
dc.subject.decsAneuploidia
dc.subject.decsEdad gestacional
dc.subject.decsPrimer trimestre del embarazo
dc.subject.decsUltrasonografía prenatal
dc.subject.meshAbortion, Spontaneous
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAneuploidy
dc.subject.meshBelgium
dc.subject.meshBulgaria
dc.subject.meshChorionic Villi Sampling
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshGestational Age
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIncidence
dc.subject.meshOdds Ratio
dc.subject.meshPregnancy
dc.subject.meshPregnancy Trimester, First
dc.subject.meshPropensity Score
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studies
dc.subject.meshRisk Assessment
dc.subject.meshRisk Factors
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.subject.meshUltrasonography, Prenatal
dc.titleNew approach for estimating risk of miscarriage after chorionic villus sampling.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number56
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC7984173.pdf
Size:
881.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Gil_New_MatrialSuplementario.zip
Size:
25.09 KB
Format: