Publication:
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

dc.contributor.authorChamandi, Chekrallah
dc.contributor.authorBarbanti, Marco
dc.contributor.authorMunoz-Garcia, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorLatib, Azeem
dc.contributor.authorNombela-Franco, Luis
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Ibanez, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorVeiga-Fernandez, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorCheema, Asim N
dc.contributor.authorCruz-Gonzalez, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorSerra, Vicenç
dc.contributor.authorTamburino, Corrado
dc.contributor.authorMangieri, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorColombo, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Quevedo, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorElizaga, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorLaughlin, Gerard
dc.contributor.authorLee, Dae-Hyun
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Del Blanco, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Gabella, Tania
dc.contributor.authorMarsal, Josep-Ramon
dc.contributor.authorCôté, Mélanie
dc.contributor.authorPhilippon, François
dc.contributor.authorRodés-Cabau, Josep
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T10:03:28Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T10:03:28Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis study sought to evaluate the long-term clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Conduction disturbances leading to PPI are common following TAVR. However, no data exist regarding the impact of PPI on long-term outcomes post-TAVR. This was a multicenter study including a total of 1,629 patients without prior PPI undergoing TAVR (balloon- and self-expandable valves in 45% and 55% of patients, respectively). Follow-up clinical, echocardiographic, and pacing data were obtained at a median of 4 years (interquartile range: 3 to 5 years) post-TAVR. PPI was required in 322 (19.8%) patients within 30 days post-TAVR (26.9% and 10.9% in patients receiving self- and balloon-expandable CoreValve and Edwards systems, respectively). Up to 86% of patients with PPI exhibited pacing >1% of the time during follow-up (>40% pacing in 51% of patients). There were no differences between patients with and without PPI in total mortality (48.5% vs. 42.9%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95 to 1.39; p = 0.15) and cardiovascular mortality (14.9% vs. 15.5%, adjusted HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.30; p = 0.66) at follow-up. However, patients with PPI had higher rates of rehospitalization due to heart failure (22.4% vs. 16.1%; adjusted HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.89; p = 0.019), and the combined endpoint of mortality or heart failure rehospitalization (59.6% vs. 51.9%; adjusted HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.48; p = 0.011). PPI was associated with lesser improvement in LVEF over time (p = 0.051 for changes in LVEF between groups), particularly in patients with reduced LVEF before TAVR (p = 0.005 for changes in LVEF between groups). The need for PPI post-TAVR was frequent and associated with an increased risk of heart failure rehospitalization and lack of LVEF improvement, but not mortality, after a median follow-up of 4 years. Most patients with new PPI post-TAVR exhibited some degree of pacing activity at follow-up.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.032
dc.identifier.essn1876-7605
dc.identifier.pmid29413244
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.032
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/12095
dc.issue.number3
dc.journal.titleJACC. Cardiovascular interventions
dc.journal.titleabbreviationJACC Cardiovasc Interv
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
dc.page.number301-310
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeMulticenter Study
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectaortic stenosis
dc.subjectleft ventricular ejection fraction
dc.subjectpacemaker
dc.subjecttranscatheter aortic valve replacement
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over
dc.subject.meshAortic Valve
dc.subject.meshAortic Valve Stenosis
dc.subject.meshArrhythmias, Cardiac
dc.subject.meshBalloon Valvuloplasty
dc.subject.meshCardiac Pacing, Artificial
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHeart Failure
dc.subject.meshHeart Valve Prosthesis
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshItaly
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshPacemaker, Artificial
dc.subject.meshPatient Readmission
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshProsthesis Design
dc.subject.meshQuebec
dc.subject.meshRisk Factors
dc.subject.meshSpain
dc.subject.meshStroke Volume
dc.subject.meshTime Factors
dc.subject.meshTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshVentricular Function, Left
dc.titleLong-Term Outcomes in Patients With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number11
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files