Publication:
Management of incidentally discovered appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors after an appendicectomy.

dc.contributor.authorMuñoz de Nova, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorHernando, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorSampedro Núñez, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorVázquez Benítez, Greissy Tibisay
dc.contributor.authorTriviño Ibáñez, Eva María
dc.contributor.authorDel Olmo García, María Isabel
dc.contributor.authorBarriuso, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorCapdevila, Jaume
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Pérez, Elena
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-03T14:24:31Z
dc.date.available2023-05-03T14:24:31Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractAppendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (aNETs) are an uncommon neoplasm that is relatively indolent in most cases. They are typically diagnosed in younger patients than other neuroendocrine tumors and are often an incidental finding after an appendectomy. Although there are numerous clinical practice guidelines on management of aNETs, there is continues to be a dearth of evidence on optimal treatment. Management of these tumors is stratified according to risk of locoregional and distant metastasis. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding tumors that measure 1-2 cm. In these cases, some histopathological features such as size, tumor grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion, or mesoappendix infiltration must also be considered. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans are recommended for evaluating the presence of additional disease, except in the case of tumors smaller than 1 cm without additional risk factors. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy or positron emission tomography with computed tomography should be considered in cases with suspected residual or distant disease. The main point of controversy is the indication for performing a completion right hemicolectomy after an initial appendectomy, based on the risk of lymph node metastases. The main factor considered is tumor size and 2 cm is the most common threshold for indicating a colectomy. Other factors such as mesoappendix infiltration, lymphovascular invasion, or tumor grade may also be considered. On the other hand, potential complications, and decreased quality of life after a hemicolectomy as well as the lack of evidence on benefits in terms of survival must be taken into consideration. In this review, we present data regarding the current indications, outcomes, and benefits of a colectomy.
dc.identifier.doi10.3748/wjg.v28.i13.1304
dc.identifier.essn2219-2840
dc.identifier.pmcPMC9099182
dc.identifier.pmid35645544
dc.identifier.pubmedURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099182/pdf
dc.identifier.unpaywallURLhttps://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i13.1304
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/21612
dc.issue.number13
dc.journal.titleWorld journal of gastroenterology
dc.journal.titleabbreviationWorld J Gastroenterol
dc.language.isoen
dc.organizationHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.page.number1304-1314
dc.pubmedtypeJournal Article
dc.pubmedtypeReview
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectAppendiceal neoplasms
dc.subjectCarcinoid tumor
dc.subjectColectomy
dc.subjectNeoplasm grading
dc.subjectNeuroendocrine tumors
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subject.meshAppendectomy
dc.subject.meshAppendiceal Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIntestinal Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshNeuroendocrine Tumors
dc.subject.meshPancreatic Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshQuality of Life
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studies
dc.subject.meshStomach Neoplasms
dc.titleManagement of incidentally discovered appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors after an appendicectomy.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number28
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC9099182.pdf
Size:
1.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format