Publication: Efficacy and safety of HD-tDCS and respiratory rehabilitation for critically ill patients with COVID-19 The HD-RECOVERY randomized clinical trial.
Loading...
Identifiers
Date
2022-05-05
Authors
Andrade, Suellen Marinho
Cecilia de Araujo Silvestre, Maria
Tenorio de França, Eduardo Eriko
Bezerra Sales Queiroz, Maria Heloisa
de Jesus Santana, Kelly
Lima Holmes Madruga, Marcela Lais
Torres Teixeira Mendes, Cristina Katya
Araujo de Oliveira, Eliane
Bezerra, Joao Felipe
Barreto, Renata Gomes
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ADRS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with muscle fatigue, corticospinal pathways dysfunction, and mortality. High-Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) may be used to attenuate clinical impairment in these patients. The HD-RECOVERY randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HD-tDCS with respiratory rehabilitation in patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to COVID-19. Fifty-six critically ill patients were randomized 1:1 to active (n = 28) or sham (n = 28) HD-tDCS (twice a day, 30-min, 3-mA) plus respiratory rehabilitation for up to 10 days or until intensive care unit discharge. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days during the first 28 days, defined as the number of days free from mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, secondary outcomes such as delirium, organ failure, hospital length of stay and adverse effects were investigated. Active HD-tDCS induced more ventilator-free days compared to sham HD-tDCS. Patients in the active group vs in the sham group experienced lower organ dysfunction, delirium, and length of stay rates over time. In addition, positive clinical response was higher in the active vs sham group. There was no significant difference in the prespecified secondary outcomes at 5 days. Adverse events were similar between groups. Among patients with COVID-19 and moderate to severe ARDS, use of active HD-tDCS compared with sham HD-tDCS plus respiratory rehabilitation resulted in a statistically significant increase in the number of ventilator-free days over 28 days. HD-tDCS combined with concurrent rehabilitation therapy is a safe, feasible, potentially add-on intervention, and further trials should examine HD-tDCS efficacy in a larger sample of patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia.
Description
MeSH Terms
COVID-19
Critical Illness
Delirium
Humans
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
SARS-CoV-2
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Critical Illness
Delirium
Humans
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
SARS-CoV-2
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
DeCS Terms
Delirio
Enfermedad Critica
Estimulacion Transcraneal de Corriente
Humanos
SARS-CoV-2
Sindrome de Dificultad Respiratoria
Enfermedad Critica
Estimulacion Transcraneal de Corriente
Humanos
SARS-CoV-2
Sindrome de Dificultad Respiratoria
CIE Terms
Keywords
Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Coronavirus disease, High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation, Noninvasive brain stimulation, Respiratory rehabilitation
Citation
Andrade SM, Cecília de Araújo Silvestre M, Tenório de França EÉ, Bezerra Sales Queiroz MH, de Jesus Santana K, Lima Holmes Madruga ML, et al. Efficacy and safety of HD-tDCS and respiratory rehabilitation for critically ill patients with COVID-19 The HD-RECOVERY randomized clinical trial. Brain Stimul. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):780-788